The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

350Z in the flesh

Thread Tools
 
Old May 23, 2002 | 09:14 PM
  #31  
JsnS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Default

ick
Reply
Old May 23, 2002 | 09:58 PM
  #32  
Speedracer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Looks more like a touring coupe than a sports car
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:35 AM
  #33  
DJSang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,319
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada
Default

Why does the fat little porker weigh so much?
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 07:36 AM
  #34  
MHK S2000's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Solvang
Default

Originally posted by Sime
Yuck, yuck, triple yuck.

I just can't get over how horrid this car is. I've tried to give it the time of day, but every time I look at it, I just want to. Specs look ok, but it's a face only a mother could love. Performance is only one part of the equation, otherwise we'd all be driving round in F20C powered 1400lb dune buggies! Hmmm...now that's a thought!

Why do people have to keep making excuses for this car about it's aesthetics needing to be "seen for real to be appreciated?" If it can't look good in photographs, then it's not worth looking at in the flesh. I have a feeling that this one is going to go down about as popular as the 'California 300Z' that they made in the late '80's. I thought Nissan learnt their lesson the first time?

I'm going out now to get some fresh air.......I'm feeling a little queeZy!

Because some cars DO have to be seen in person to really get a feel for its aesthetics. For example, I did not like our S2000's when I first saw the pictures in the car mags. I think we can all more or less agree that the S2000 does not always photograph very well. It loses alot of the 'impact' and subtleties that you can see in flesh.

I just like to reserve my judgement till I see one on the street.....not in a glossy showroom, not some pictures, not some brochures....but in person on the street, clean and dirty.

Just my .02 cents.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 07:59 AM
  #35  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally posted by JsnS2k
ick
"ick": A fish disease! (How appropriate.)
Reply
Old May 27, 2002 | 06:14 PM
  #36  
nine grand's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: Gunma Prefecture,
Default

The G35 coupe will be much nicer concerning the styling. I love the new coupe. Too bad I don't have even the slightest bit of cash for one as a daily.
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 08:37 AM
  #37  
Hiroprotaganist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default



Give me the track edition in blue please....
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 05:07 AM
  #38  
MDXLuvr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,281
Likes: 0
From: N. Tx.
Default

just wondering what u guys think of it now that u have seen it in person.

It doesn't look appealing in pics, but in person- it looks pretty good. I think the rear end needs help. The rear looks better with the nismo spoiler.

too bad, it is such a lard ass. 3400lbs for track version.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 08:17 AM
  #39  
Ludedude's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,835
Likes: 1
From: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Default

It's still a turd.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 08:32 AM
  #40  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally posted by MDXLuvr
I think the rear end needs help.
...........and the front.........and the side..........and the hood...........and the...........
But HEY! I really did like the way the brakes looked through those wheels, though!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 AM.