The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

J's GT

Old May 21, 2012 | 06:52 PM
  #31  
edspecR's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,596
Likes: 6
From: Socal, Norcal
Default

Originally Posted by ScandinavianFlick
Three things lead me to believe that neither of these are an actual racecar: no roll bars, the softtop is still in place despite having a wing, and they're both running tires that are too narrow for the wheels.

There's no reason to widebody a track S2000. The drag reduction from the vented wheelarches is offset by the larger frontal area, the wheel bearings are loaded out of design specs by the low-offset wheels, and if you're FI and really need the contact patch, you can fit 315-width tires in the back with a cut and pull.

Plus, to be honest, anyone building an S2000 racecar is doing so because it fell within their price bracket. They're not going to spend the cost of a second car on bodykitting it.

These cars are a well-executed but questionable aesthetic statement, nothing more.
spoken like a true cynic im surprised no one's come by yet to put your flawed logic and bias to shame
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 07:30 PM
  #32  
ITRbroham's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Socal, CA
Default

Originally Posted by edspecR
Originally Posted by ScandinavianFlick' timestamp='1337365976' post='21710461
Three things lead me to believe that neither of these are an actual racecar: no roll bars, the softtop is still in place despite having a wing, and they're both running tires that are too narrow for the wheels.

There's no reason to widebody a track S2000. The drag reduction from the vented wheelarches is offset by the larger frontal area, the wheel bearings are loaded out of design specs by the low-offset wheels, and if you're FI and really need the contact patch, you can fit 315-width tires in the back with a cut and pull.

Plus, to be honest, anyone building an S2000 racecar is doing so because it fell within their price bracket. They're not going to spend the cost of a second car on bodykitting it.

These cars are a well-executed but questionable aesthetic statement, nothing more.
spoken like a true cynic im surprised no one's come by yet to put your flawed logic and bias to shame
Most of the time, I find it simply too tiring to try to counter the same ole'misguided opinions and attitudes. I just realize that folks are entitiled to them and it's doesn't affect me in anyway.

Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 10:46 PM
  #33  
edspecR's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,596
Likes: 6
From: Socal, Norcal
Default

Originally Posted by ITRbroham
Originally Posted by edspecR' timestamp='1337655122' post='21718714
[quote name='ScandinavianFlick' timestamp='1337365976' post='21710461']
Three things lead me to believe that neither of these are an actual racecar: no roll bars, the softtop is still in place despite having a wing, and they're both running tires that are too narrow for the wheels.

There's no reason to widebody a track S2000. The drag reduction from the vented wheelarches is offset by the larger frontal area, the wheel bearings are loaded out of design specs by the low-offset wheels, and if you're FI and really need the contact patch, you can fit 315-width tires in the back with a cut and pull.

Plus, to be honest, anyone building an S2000 racecar is doing so because it fell within their price bracket. They're not going to spend the cost of a second car on bodykitting it.

These cars are a well-executed but questionable aesthetic statement, nothing more.
spoken like a true cynic im surprised no one's come by yet to put your flawed logic and bias to shame
Most of the time, I find it simply too tiring to try to counter the same ole'misguided opinions and attitudes. I just realize that folks are entitiled to them and it's doesn't affect me in anyway.
[/quote]

<3
Reply
Old May 22, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #34  
g0g3tt4's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Nor Cal (Humboldt, Ca)
Default

Whether he is a cynic or is not relevant IMHO. If you don't agree with his logic that's ok... but at least say if you think the cars are tracked.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsoshi2007
The S2000 Gallery
52
Sep 29, 2009 08:06 AM
bibiboo
The S2000 Gallery
58
Sep 29, 2009 01:39 AM
DR. FEINSTONE
S2000 Modifications and Parts
22
Nov 10, 2008 08:33 PM
jdmj0
The S2000 Gallery
56
Jan 6, 2007 07:43 PM
AmuseAP1
The S2000 Gallery
48
Dec 1, 2004 11:33 AM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM.