The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

J's Type S front...anyone have it?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #31  
Brownergy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 1
From: Lusby, MD
Default

yeah, I figured the race teams would use the CF due to weight savings, but then I thought about the abuse and figured they might rock the FRP's for budget reasons. You can buy replacement splitters for that bumper in FRP or CF.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #32  
CynCrvrAP1's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,882
Likes: 0
From: Where dreamers dream!
Default

Originally Posted by GiFF,Aug 16 2005, 03:40 PM
look how low this race car is... it warrants the short stroke dampers...

can't wait to move back to live for good in asia. super smooth tracks...
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 05:50 PM
  #33  
CynCrvrAP1's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,882
Likes: 0
From: Where dreamers dream!
Default

Originally Posted by MrAlex,Aug 16 2005, 11:01 AM
Hey Frank...

On the Speedstar site, there is a Rio Yellow one with just the front. I think it's fine.

i think it looks good to, BUT you need the gt wing to compliment it imo.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 06:03 PM
  #34  
Kel's Avatar
Kel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,831
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default

Originally Posted by CynCrvrAP1,Aug 16 2005, 06:50 PM
i think it looks good to, BUT you need the gt wing to compliment it imo.
I don't think you need the GT wing unless you track, which I'm sure the speedstar guys do. I mean.. why would you want so much drag going in a straight line? Don't you want to save gas?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #35  
GiFF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Aug 16 2005, 05:15 PM
Actually is warrants super stiff dampers and springs, I'd imagine there is still good stroke on the dampers, like when the cars inside tires almost off the ground, I bet those dampers extend a long way to keep those inside tires on the ground and giving some traction. Also known as suspension "droop"

And yes HunterEZ, that's what I'm refering too. Front bumper w/ no side skirts, they aren't functional, just more weight.

I also notice every picture of that car has the front splitter painted, do you think they are using the FRP version, or the CF and painting the splitter?
that's definitely true. look at the tires, it's racing slicks. you need high spring rates and valving to match to use such tires. about stroke, if too much compression, the whole car will be scraping on the ground the whole time. so it's pretty short stroked like all jdm coilovers. that's in comparison with the european/american brands. the damages are from the rumble strips on the track or contact with other objects or cars...

also, all these race cars experience wheel lift at certain loads. you'll see it in all types of racing... even on my shifter karts... and i think F1...
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #36  
Brownergy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 1
From: Lusby, MD
Default

Agreed, althought wheel lift is not optimal, with some setups it is unevitable. I do think that in American Racing leagues (ALMANS, SCCA, Grand Am, etc.) the rules really limit lower ride heights compared to other countries racing leagues. C6-R vettes and porsches don't ride that low.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #37  
GiFF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Aug 16 2005, 06:12 PM
Agreed, althought wheel lift is not optimal, with some setups it is unevitable. I do think that in American Racing leagues (ALMANS, SCCA, Grand Am, etc.) the rules really limit lower ride heights compared to other countries racing leagues. C6-R vettes and porsches don't ride that low.
about the ride height... could this be the conditions of the tracks around america? i've only been on the west coast tracks. never seen the middle or east coast tracks. educate me please...
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #38  
Brownergy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 1
From: Lusby, MD
Default

Originally Posted by HunterEz,Aug 16 2005, 09:03 PM
I don't think you need the GT wing unless you track, which I'm sure the speedstar guys do. I mean.. why would you want so much drag going in a straight line? Don't you want to save gas?
I think he was commenting on balancing the look of the car. Although if that front bumper creates any downforce, it may cause the rear to lift, which means a rear wing might be needed, mine you rear wings are pretty adjustable, so finding the sweet spot of evening out the cars handling while not losing to much fuel economy.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #39  
Brownergy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 1
From: Lusby, MD
Default

Originally Posted by GiFF,Aug 16 2005, 09:16 PM
about the ride height... could this be the conditions of the tracks around america? i've only been on the west coast tracks. never seen the middle or east coast tracks. educate me please...
Might be conditions, might be eligible vehicles such as say the RS4's. They have a lot of hardware and drivetrain under there bodies which would limit there bodies ride heights. I honestly don't know for sure, just speculation.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #40  
GiFF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Aug 16 2005, 06:18 PM
Might be conditions, might be eligible vehicles such as say the RS4's. They have a lot of hardware and drivetrain under there bodies which would limit there bodies ride heights. I honestly don't know for sure, just speculation.
it would be nice to actually find out the reason for that...

oh well...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 AM.