LFA vs. GTR
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 0
From: SFV
LFA vs. GTR
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 1
how can it be sad ?
a v10 who rev 9k vs a basic v6 twin turbo
the LFA used so much CF,the aero is amazing,its just wow, its like a piece of art, a picasso, the gtr is a good car dont get me wrong ,yes u can compare numbers on paper but at the end of the day the LFa is in another league !!
IMO
The Lfa is already a SUPERCAR and the GTR will never be a supercar..
a v10 who rev 9k vs a basic v6 twin turbo
the LFA used so much CF,the aero is amazing,its just wow, its like a piece of art, a picasso, the gtr is a good car dont get me wrong ,yes u can compare numbers on paper but at the end of the day the LFa is in another league !!
IMO
The Lfa is already a SUPERCAR and the GTR will never be a supercar..
GTR will beat that on a track
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
They intentionally picked the only race where this would even be a contest. The GTR can hang with just about anything in the world in the quarter, but think of the slaughter this would have been in the mile or a hot lap.
I say this every time though, IT ISNT ABOUT NUMBERS. Yes, you can get a faster car for less $$$ somewhere else, but the LF-A is special in a way that no car out of Japan has been in a very long time. As S2000 owners, you should understand this or else you'd all be driving Cobalt SS and SRT Neons.
I say this every time though, IT ISNT ABOUT NUMBERS. Yes, you can get a faster car for less $$$ somewhere else, but the LF-A is special in a way that no car out of Japan has been in a very long time. As S2000 owners, you should understand this or else you'd all be driving Cobalt SS and SRT Neons.