my eyes are bleeding!
if those pics are not chopped then there is an extreme issue with the CCD of someones camera
the artifacting and the color on the wing and other suspect areas of the photos are leading people to think there is some poor chopping going on. The teeth on the front of the one pic is just laughable. If that was an actual vinyl application to the car or some spoof done during a track day, the edges of it are so sloppy it looks like someone just chopped it in to the pic being very careless while doing so.
Sorry to add fuel to the fire but I can circle the areas on some of the pics I found to be VERY suspect to illustrate why I thought it was a chop job
the artifacting and the color on the wing and other suspect areas of the photos are leading people to think there is some poor chopping going on. The teeth on the front of the one pic is just laughable. If that was an actual vinyl application to the car or some spoof done during a track day, the edges of it are so sloppy it looks like someone just chopped it in to the pic being very careless while doing so.
Sorry to add fuel to the fire but I can circle the areas on some of the pics I found to be VERY suspect to illustrate why I thought it was a chop job
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Dec 19 2005, 07:30 PM
Also, you lied. You said "you didn't see that I addressed the color issue".
However, you earlier replied to my initial post that mentioned the color and the bad camera (quoting it fully in your response) and said "The COLOR is photoshopped. That car is not pink. I believe its Silverstone in reality.
However, you earlier replied to my initial post that mentioned the color and the bad camera (quoting it fully in your response) and said "The COLOR is photoshopped. That car is not pink. I believe its Silverstone in reality.
I did not lie. I did not see that your post addressed the color issue. The quote that you are using supports this fact.
I stated "The COLOR is photoshopped..." in response to the fact that, when reading the first part of your post, I jumped to the conclusion (albeit incorrectly) that you were under the impression that we were saying the wing was photoshopped onto the car.
My argument was that the car was not pink. It in fact is not pink. Now my reasoning for why the car was not pink (I believed it to be after-the-fact photo editing, when in reality it was a bad CCD) was totally incorrect.
I was incorrect about the following:
- The car is not Silverstone in reality (I mistook it for Krazik's I believe)
- The photo (according to the evidence presented) was not photoshopped, instead the color problems were due to a bad camera.
I however did not lie, and do NOT appreciate being called a liar. Once again you have made a personal accusation and crossed the boundary from "debate" to "insult."
sorry if I stirred up anything, I didn't think anybody would take my "expert" comment so seriously.
so simmering down to a common level, the shark teeth is kinda funny, but I don't really have to worry about that as I'll never see them on the track, unless of course Imma get lapped
so simmering down to a common level, the shark teeth is kinda funny, but I don't really have to worry about that as I'll never see them on the track, unless of course Imma get lapped
lol wow. Nothing like a p*ssing contest on whose a better judge of what is or isnt photoshopped...
Further, maybe someone should take a break from work and go on a vacation. I hope you all dont snap at your wives like that too.
If it helps, my dad could beat up your dads.
Further, maybe someone should take a break from work and go on a vacation. I hope you all dont snap at your wives like that too.
If it helps, my dad could beat up your dads.






