new shoes.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

May 4, 2006 | 10:42 PM

#31

dtang21

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 382

Likes: 1

Looks good! I was interested in these as well. I think at 9" or 9.5" they come in face 2s.

the hotness...

May 4, 2006 | 10:53 PM

#32

WyattH

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 8,106

Likes: 2

From: PNW

I wish we could run the 9''+ rear on our car.

May 5, 2006 | 02:57 AM

#33

mackeywatson

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,293

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by [AP2-2NV

,May 4 2006, 07:17 PM] and the back is 2mm short with a 17x9 +43. the calculator says it should be +45 with a 245 tire but you should be fine anyway the rear is pretty roomy.

That's what I was thinking too. My friend has the blitz wheels in 17x8 +45, 17x9 +45, and they fit fine w/ a 245 rear tire. So 2mm further shouldn't make much of a difference, and w/ rolled fenders should be fine, right? Someone enlighten me if I'm making a horrible mistake. I want to get the FN01RC, especially after seeing these pics.

Also I don't really want to get the 17x7 and 17x8 cuz I figure if I go thru the trouble of getting rims I don't want to go only half an inch wider.