NSX F50
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: B4 London (UK) Now SF Bay
Originally Posted by S2KANDRE,Aug 14 2004, 05:04 AM
it MIGHT be a bit faster than the F50, but there will never be a day when the NSX will come up to the level of the F50.
I know your just saying it as in speed, but common the ferrari was made in 95 and the nsx made in 02 (im talking about the ones in the pic) and they are not even close in any comparison. I rather not spend the money on the nsx and have it just do its job of being a great sports car.
I know your just saying it as in speed, but common the ferrari was made in 95 and the nsx made in 02 (im talking about the ones in the pic) and they are not even close in any comparison. I rather not spend the money on the nsx and have it just do its job of being a great sports car.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Abu Dhabi
Originally Posted by JayDeeEm,Aug 14 2004, 03:13 AM
All that money and man hours... for a fake Ferrari?! 
plus that the NSX has very nice design..... why to change ityou may do this coverting if you have Pontiac Fiero NOT NSX
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
From: Athens/Attiki
[QUOTE=S2KANDRE,Aug 14 2004, 07:04 AM] it MIGHT be a bit faster than the F50, but there will never be a day when the NSX will come up to the level of the F50.
I know your just saying it as in speed, but common the ferrari was made in 95 and the nsx made in 02 (im talking about the ones in the pic) and they are not even close in any comparison.
I know your just saying it as in speed, but common the ferrari was made in 95 and the nsx made in 02 (im talking about the ones in the pic) and they are not even close in any comparison.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,088
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
[QUOTE=SocratesDTC,Aug 14 2004, 06:07 AM]
The F50 is the greatest Ferrari for me.
It has a downgraded F1 engine, a fully carbon fiber chassis, and a technologically advanced suspension system BUT it costs $650.000
while the NSX-T (targa) as shown in the pic costs $80.000, and i really cant understand why you're comparing a daily car Vs an unreliable supercar.. 
And please don't forget that the NSX-T is one of the slowest NSX's out there.
Old models (3.0L)
NSX (slowest NSX with bad steering. But is was enough to outperform the 1991 ferraris) <<Honda introduces the first fuly aluminum chassis, and then ferrari follows with the F40>>
NSX-typeS (lighter than the NSX & very competitive)
NSX-typeS Zero (lighter than the typeS and improved suspension tuning)
NSX-typeR (even lighter & unbeatable in the track)
New models (3.2L)
NSX-typeS (due to the increased engine displacement its significantly faster than the old models in straight (even the type-r but the old type-r is a lot faster in track)
NSX-typeSZero (same as type-S, but even lighter)
NSX type-R (the ultimate NSX
The F50 is the greatest Ferrari for me.
It has a downgraded F1 engine, a fully carbon fiber chassis, and a technologically advanced suspension system BUT it costs $650.000
while the NSX-T (targa) as shown in the pic costs $80.000, and i really cant understand why you're comparing a daily car Vs an unreliable supercar.. And please don't forget that the NSX-T is one of the slowest NSX's out there.
Old models (3.0L)
NSX (slowest NSX with bad steering. But is was enough to outperform the 1991 ferraris) <<Honda introduces the first fuly aluminum chassis, and then ferrari follows with the F40>>
NSX-typeS (lighter than the NSX & very competitive)
NSX-typeS Zero (lighter than the typeS and improved suspension tuning)
NSX-typeR (even lighter & unbeatable in the track)
New models (3.2L)
NSX-typeS (due to the increased engine displacement its significantly faster than the old models in straight (even the type-r but the old type-r is a lot faster in track)
NSX-typeSZero (same as type-S, but even lighter)
NSX type-R (the ultimate NSX