The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Quad-charged GTR

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #21  
desmond's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
From: ★HB★
Default

Originally Posted by u8myrice' date='Dec 26 2008, 02:55 PM
A turbo pushing compressed air into a supercharger. Holy shit.
i think its the other way around...

IMHO i think they already upgraded the turbo most likely to some super monsterous size causing major turbo laq EVEN with the v-6 so they use the superchargers to boost during low RPM because the belt is more constant, and on demand. So while the turbos are being spooled up the superchargers are doing the boosting. Its kinda like the sequential set-up on some TT cars.

I might be wrong on this though

-Des
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 01:08 AM
  #22  
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by NAVY_s2k' date='Dec 26 2008, 09:55 PM
thats retarted, not "wow" b/c a turbo spins faster and flows much more air than a supercharger. once he got past 4k rpm those dinky superchargers would act as a restriction b/c they couldnt push air out as fast as the turbo's were pushin air in. Alot of the mini cooper guys ran into this prob when they twin charged the old cooper S's. that setup is definitely for bling factor and not HP gain.
tell that to koenneigsegg
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #23  
PsykotiK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,821
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton
Default

they do it just cause they can
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 01:46 AM
  #24  
SPECIAL-OPS-S2K's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 1
From: Lincoln, NE
Default

wow
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 02:32 AM
  #25  
Mr. Francesco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20,371
Likes: 1
From: never never land
Default

Originally Posted by SojuSoulja' date='Dec 26 2008, 06:17 PM
Y not just upgrade to a larger turbo?
No one is really touching the motor yet on these cars besides with simple bolt ons. This is the most extreme I have seen so far.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #26  
AP2Berlina's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by PsykotiK' date='Dec 27 2008, 02:19 AM
they do it just cause they can
haha exactly
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #27  
jonner's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 17,393
Likes: 19
From: Kiltokyo
Default

Nice....
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #28  
chetly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Default

With all that crap bolted on, you would think it would make more than 550hp or 600hp like the article says. Sounds like its just a waste of time and money to me.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #29  
B_SoFresh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

lol. It amazes me how the s2k community always looks for power numbers when we should know better. 650hp modestly rated but the gains in torque should be huge. It says it's not intended for drag racing so a rediculously big turbo, that would take ages to spin, but haul ass up top is out of the question.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 12:34 PM
  #30  
TurboR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: 405
Default

crazy!!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:20 AM.