S2k---->EVO---->M3
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,335
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
If I had the means, I would also get an M3....for now this is how the last cars went in the last 2 years:
STi <- A4 1.8T Q <- WRX <- A4 2.8
S2000 <- 515hp 300ZTT <- S2000 < - 400hp 300ZTT
At least I am keeping it in the family.... :-)
STi <- A4 1.8T Q <- WRX <- A4 2.8
S2000 <- 515hp 300ZTT <- S2000 < - 400hp 300ZTT
At least I am keeping it in the family.... :-)
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
I haven't been around as much as others, but here's my chain:
93 Civic Hatchback > 97 M3 Coupe > 01 s2000 .... and hopefully not before long... e46 M3 again. So great choice silverbullet.
I guess i'm a Honda/BMW guy... at least until I can afford the Ferrari. Honda/BMW/Ferrari...
Sorry Porsche fans, if I didnt have enough for a Modena, but could finagle a Carrera, i'd still opt for the M3 and pocket the difference.
Disclaimer: I'm not demeaning Porsche automobiles. They make fantastic sports cars. Its just my opinion.
93 Civic Hatchback > 97 M3 Coupe > 01 s2000 .... and hopefully not before long... e46 M3 again. So great choice silverbullet.
I guess i'm a Honda/BMW guy... at least until I can afford the Ferrari. Honda/BMW/Ferrari...
Sorry Porsche fans, if I didnt have enough for a Modena, but could finagle a Carrera, i'd still opt for the M3 and pocket the difference.
Disclaimer: I'm not demeaning Porsche automobiles. They make fantastic sports cars. Its just my opinion.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
E46 M3 
Evo=Fast as hell, but equally as ugly. I need looks and speed, good mix of both. S is good mix of both for now. M3 is a much better mix of looks and speed(also twice the price of an S). Good luck
Evo=Fast as hell, but equally as ugly. I need looks and speed, good mix of both. S is good mix of both for now. M3 is a much better mix of looks and speed(also twice the price of an S). Good luck
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally posted by DVDoughboy
I'm just like you Loki except I skipped the WRX
02 S2000 -> 02 M3 -> 00 M coupe
I'm just like you Loki except I skipped the WRX
02 S2000 -> 02 M3 -> 00 M coupe
BTW, I didn't mean to turn this into a "what car did I have thread", but just a comparison of what I and other people had after the S2000, which also included a E46 M3. I guess what didn't get conveyed was why would he think an E46 M3 would be any better than the EVO if he didn't like that? Especially since he misses a two-seater convertible...
Unless there's a brandname bling factor involved the EVO is every bit the, if not better, performance car the (overpriced) M3 is.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
From: Bronxville/NY
This is how i ve gone
*Coming in MAY 2004 S2000 Rio Yellow
^---2002 S2000 Spa Yellow
^---2001 S2000 Spa Yellow
^---2001 S2000 Spa Yellow
^---2000 Type R Flamenco Black Pearl
^---2000 Type R Phoenix Yellow<---2000 GSR Taffeta White
^---1996 Integra GS Special Edition Green
^---1990 Honda Accord Tan
The last four cars i've had,
(sighs) well that is just devotion.
*Coming in MAY 2004 S2000 Rio Yellow
^---2002 S2000 Spa Yellow
^---2001 S2000 Spa Yellow
^---2001 S2000 Spa Yellow
^---2000 Type R Flamenco Black Pearl
^---2000 Type R Phoenix Yellow<---2000 GSR Taffeta White
^---1996 Integra GS Special Edition Green
^---1990 Honda Accord Tan
The last four cars i've had,
(sighs) well that is just devotion.
