The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

SPY SHOTS!

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #21  
Brownergy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 1
From: Lusby, MD
Default

Why can't the Evo or Sti be attractive cars? Why do they have to be so fugly?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:02 PM
  #22  
mkell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Default

What the hell?!?!?!?

I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't sell a single one of those cars. So so so ugly!!

Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #23  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Aug 9 2005, 02:50 PM
Why can't the Evo or Sti be attractive cars? Why do they have to be so fugly?


Both are pretty fugly...
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #24  
ADiSKOTEC's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Default

I take better looking dumps. Who the hell designs these things?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #25  
Kel's Avatar
Kel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,831
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default

Ugly as usualy.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #26  
JohnsS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 0
From: McAllen
Default

Originally Posted by Highrpmek,Aug 9 2005, 04:50 PM
Why can't the Evo or Sti be attractive cars? Why do they have to be so fugly?
I agree ... especially with the EVO 8 ... test drove one the other day ... go to be one of the cheapest (cheaply made), plastic looking-feeling interiors around.

Even the engine compartment / components look cheap ... not trying to offend anyone

On the positive side the car ran GREAT ... but defiantely not comparable to the STI ... STI is ugly but runs like a friggin' bat out of hell ... gobs of low-end torque
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #27  
seminole2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Default

It's not that bad. Tail lights are an improvement, albeit a modest one.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #28  
fly_S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
Default

Fantastically ugly
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #29  
S2KNightRider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria
Default

Originally Posted by JohnsS2K,Aug 9 2005, 02:20 PM
I agree ... especially with the EVO 8 ... test drove one the other day ... go to be one of the cheapest (cheaply made), plastic looking-feeling interiors around.

Even the engine compartment / components look cheap ... not trying to offend anyone

On the positive side the car ran GREAT ... but defiantely not comparable to the STI ... STI is ugly but runs like a friggin' bat out of hell ... gobs of low-end torque
I'm offended

But I do agree..its definantly merely a factory modded Lancer ES. I got the SSL package in hopes up getting a little "higher quality" seeming car. I'm happy with what I got for now.

I wanted a M3, but the $ just wasn't there.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #30  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,426
Likes: 1,648
From: SJC
Default

They had me until that front piggy-nose. Yuck.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM.