TEASER
Originally Posted by nichigo' date='Jan 27 2009, 05:20 PM
That looks like alot of lip...unless he gave inaccurate information about the rear wheel spec 

Originally Posted by Antonov' date='Jan 27 2009, 05:34 PM
its almost the same, we've measured, its just more exposed because the spokes concave, as opposed to them covering the lip 

It cannot be a 9.5 +35. I've seen a 9.5 +28 CE28N and it DOES NOT concave.
Farid "HH-s2000" (J's Silverstone AP2 from germany) was running a 9.5 +35 and it did not concave. Just a lot of lippage
Farid "HH-s2000" (J's Silverstone AP2 from germany) was running a 9.5 +35 and it did not concave. Just a lot of lippage
This is going to cause me to get flamed, but I was so mad after seeing another stupid teaser I have to say something. I don't understand why it's so popular on this site to put wheels on that don't fit. They make the exact same wheel in a perfect offset and size in the same color. You can't fit a wider tire on the car because the wheel sticks out too far. You have to run such ridiculous camber to have any chance of allowing the tire to clear. Then you go out and buy some piece of crap tires because your going to ruin them in 6000 miles from running such aggressive camber, so you're completely negating any potential benefit from running a lower offset by using crappy tires. Who wants to tear up some Advan's in 6000 miles. I guess the only way to solve the problem would be to get those awful, awful overfenders that look like some screwed on a piece of plastic onto you nice stock fenders. I don't care if they are made by ASM. They're ugly.
I can fully understand running a non-staggered set-up for the track so you can fit a larger caliper behind the front wheel.
I'm sorry to vent, but someone has to say it.
I can fully understand running a non-staggered set-up for the track so you can fit a larger caliper behind the front wheel.
I'm sorry to vent, but someone has to say it.





