The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Typical concaved CE28's....sorta

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 06:44 AM
  #21  
liquidgsr's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 1
From: VA
Default

Love the color choice for the wheels.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 06:58 AM
  #22  
Dreaming_S2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,194
Likes: 28
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by alexisthemovie
oh my bad, was thinking of 17's... 18x9.5 +34 aren't concave (they have the L1 face). I actually had a set of CE's in this spec before, however I can't remember if they were +40 or +47.

vyets: +42 is a 5x120 offset

OP: fitment looks great!
They really need to start listing the faces on their website

Going to go out on a limb and guess that they're +40, IF they're not what dt07 was talking about (old set of +35's)

OP: Does it rub in the rear at all? It looks like it would right at the point where the fender meets the rear bumper...Not that it matters. Mine does on bigger bumps, it's just that my rear wheels fit just about exactly how yours do.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 08:06 AM
  #23  
hughs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: HOTLANTA
Default

nice wheels, but the color choice doesnt fit your car.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #24  
ohGene's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Default

thanks for all the comments guys

FromaDB2toanAP1: the bumper is actually a replica from e-auto

Dreaming_S2k: they right rear actually do rub but very very slightly. i didnt roll the lip completely flat so ill do another roll soon.

Offsets: no comment
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #25  
vyets's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by alexisthemovie
oh my bad, was thinking of 17's... 18x9.5 +34 aren't concave (they have the L1 face). I actually had a set of CE's in this spec before, however I can't remember if they were +40 or +47.

vyets: +42 is a 5x120 offset

OP: fitment looks great!
I'm pretty sure itx 5x114 I saw a set for sale not too long ago on yahoo auctions and I was thinking about getting it but I didn't want 18's
And it does make sense if the offset was in the 40's because his running a full sized tyre with hardly any bodywork. It's def not 18x9.5+40 caus my mates got them on his s2k at the moment and when I saw the +42 concave I was laughing.

I can't seem to find any pictures
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #26  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

NICE! Looks awesome. I have 18" Ce28s and would love that setup on the rear.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 03:52 PM
  #27  
Grady's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: North,MS
Default

I like the 240.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 04:41 PM
  #28  
mavericckk..'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte
Default

need better pics.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #29  
ohGene's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mavericckk..
need better pics.
hopefully ill get better ones done on a real camera soon.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 03:46 PM
  #30  
ohGene's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Default

one of my friends just got a new camera so hopefully next week we will do a shoot. ill update asap
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 AM.