When is an S2000 not an S2000?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Feb 2, 2005 | 08:08 PM

#11

s2kjay

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 665

Likes: 0

From: fontana

theyre both more rice than i can handle...but the first one isnt that bad for some reason...still to much

Feb 3, 2005 | 03:37 AM

#12

Xplosiv

Registered User

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 10,557

Likes: 1

From: Toronto

the first one is okey, still not my style, but its not THAT bad

that second one is just nasty

Feb 3, 2005 | 05:01 AM

#13

Emil St-Hilaire

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 22,657

Likes: 490

From: St-Redempteur,Qc.

both of them

Feb 3, 2005 | 05:45 AM

#14

overlord

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 735

Likes: 0

From: NoVA

What kind of top does the first one have?? Looks weird, its like a pinted soft top with a boot cover.

Feb 3, 2005 | 06:22 AM

#15

HeelandToe

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 357

Likes: 0

From: At the Finish Line

Feb 3, 2005 | 07:29 AM

#16

Dolemike

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 2,867

Likes: 0

From: High Point

OH MAN! Both of those are FUBAR'd.

Feb 3, 2005 | 07:32 AM

#17

wortham

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 2,156

Likes: 0

From: Tucson

it's a bit over the top, but like a few others said, the first one isn't all too bad til you get to the back end. now, the second one ... god help him. poor guy is gonna live a life without good taste.

Feb 3, 2005 | 11:35 AM

#18

aznprydefloz

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 2,640

Likes: 0

From: Palo Alto

just a little over the top id say.

Feb 3, 2005 | 11:48 AM

#19

xbigsexy23x

Registered User

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 292

Likes: 0

From: fairfax

They both look BUTT....great oogly moogly.....

Feb 3, 2005 | 12:57 PM

#20

ayS

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 3,210

Likes: 0

From: San Diego, CA

not my taste, but to defintely each there own!

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 3
Next
Last