Aerodynamic efficiency
#11
Former Moderator
I would recommend a simple, manual push button, preferably on the steering wheel, to lower the spoiler for straight-line speed. And like the F-1 DRS system, a touch of the brakes would bring the spoiler back up. The driver makes the decision when a straight is straight enough for DRS. The liability exposure for a system like this would make it almost impossible to sell though.
#12
Registered User
Adjusting the wing without adjusting front downforce will leave the car unbalanced. Brake balance would also be affected differently at different speeds.
There are so many other aero projects that would have more effect. How efficient is your cooling system, a major source of drag and usually loss of front downforce? Or a front splitter with front diffusers? Or a rear diffuser? F1 and WTAC cars have concave rear diffusers starting in front of the rear axle.
There are so many other aero projects that would have more effect. How efficient is your cooling system, a major source of drag and usually loss of front downforce? Or a front splitter with front diffusers? Or a rear diffuser? F1 and WTAC cars have concave rear diffusers starting in front of the rear axle.
#13
isn't active aero illegal in all time attack classes? the only time I've seen it legal is when its stock on a car
#14
Registered User
#15
Last years winning WTAC, sort of Porsche 968, had computer controlled shocks: https://tractivesuspension.com/autos...petition-line/
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
I want to restate my intended goal here. I want to achieve the same effects as a nascar wing. Which is to reduce drag at the same time reducing lift. But as stock cars are generally always at a constant speed, the benefits of a dynamic wing are null. A greater Angle of Attack at slow speeds should generate stagnant high pressure air behind the cabin; in turn, that should deflect the laminar (low pressure) air over the wing and behind the car. At higher speeds, the optimal AoA/drag will change. My idea is that the wing angle decrease with the as the pressure atop the wing increases. if the wing angle was to drop below optimal angle at a greater speed, the downward flow of the laminar airflow would create the vacuum/lift associated at the rear of the car. The aforementioned vacuum would allow the wing to increase its angle of attack until the pressure is equalized. Again I am not an engineer in fluid dynamics so if my logic is flawed, please enlighten me.
#19
The real trick is to increase front downforce. It is easy to increase rear downforce by using a greater angle of attack, a bigger wing, or a multi-plane wing. Increasing front downforce can be done with managing the cooling airflow, add diffusers to the front splitter, design, and size of the front splitter, and designing an effective rear diffuser that moves its low-pressure area in front of the rear wheel centerline. On F1 cars, the rear diffuser can account for over 40% of total downforce.
#20
Be easier to have ground effect under body with shaped adjustable under tray/s