When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have the TC Design upper control arms. While they seem straightforward enough, I cannot get them to fit without rubbing. Before I removed the stock arm, I set the TCD piece up there and picked what I thought was the orientation that most matched the center line of the stock balljoint. I installed them as they arrived from TCD, with each heim joint about a turn and a half from fully 'in' When I put everything together, the inside of the arms touched the shocks (KW v3's) at full droop, and not just a minor rub. There's solid contact. I didn't think that was normal, so I flipped the TCD arm over. Now, shocks don't touch the arms at full droop. Instead, the inside rear of the tire touches the arm a little before full lock. Any suggestions? I'm in a bind, trying to get the car ready for it's first event on Sunday, and one of the stock arms is no good.
Ok, I flipped the arms back around the way I had them (shorer 'leg' to the rear), and lengthened the heim joints at the chassis by another turn. I now have clearance with the shock and no tire rub.
I always had interference at full droop. I didn't think the chassis was ever in that position when on the track so I didn't have to worry that the arm would come crashing into the shock body. Making the inside joints longer has now limited your max camber gain.
Is this car only auto-xed or road raced also? Auto-x you might not have a problem because of the low speeds/forces.
You have seen the Laguna thread (the good content--before the pissing match/ daytime tv drama) and my pic? Inspect the turnbuckles or replace them with something less complicated.
Yea, I don't expect the suspension to droop that much in normal use either. I store the car in my garage on a low-rise lift that picks the wheels up off the ground, and I didn't want the arm to damage the shock body.
I just bought my arms a couple of months ago. Mine did not come with the turnbuckles -- just 3 heim joints directly in the arm. I measured front camber at -4.4 L and -4.3 R, and I have the bottom adjusters maxxed 'in' right now. I haven't done a proper alignment on it yet, but that's planned for the next few weeks.
It will be an autox/hpde/timetrial car, with ambitions of wheel-to-wheel in a year or two. Yesterday was the first time it moved under its own power in over a year, so there's plenty of stuff yet to get done.
Making the inside joints longer has now limited your max camber gain.
I know, but I did the same thing when I installed mine. As I said, they still slightly touch at full droop. But not nearly as much as they did before I screwed the joints out a bit.
I did ask Tony how far he thought it would be safe to unscrew the joints. There is obviously some increase in load on the Heim (larger lever arm), and a correspondingly smaller number of threads to take that load.
Bumping this thread. I experienced a failure yesterday at an autocross. The rod end pulled out of the aluminum arm, taking all the machined threads with it. The knuckle punched a hole in the wheel and jammed it against the back of the wheel well. It looks like 'all', I will need is a complete LF suspension (control arms, knuckle, rotor, caliper), abs sensor, and a new steering rack. I'll know for sure once I get it off the trailer. I'm not sure if it was autocrossing in general, or the fact that this surface was grippy concrete that did the arm in. I bought them new, and they had 5 autocrosses on asphalt, one wet track day, and 2 autocross runs on concrete before the failure.