S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Thoughts on the A6 size 275/35ZR17?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 12:46 PM
  #1  
skahre's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default Thoughts on the A6 size 275/35ZR17?

I have been running 245/40ZR17 up front and the 275/40ZR17 in the rear in B-Stock on my non-CR AP2 for years now. I just went to order a fresh set for the season and noticed the new 275/35ZR17 size. The overall diameter would go from 25.5" on the 40 profile to 24.7" diameter on the 35 profile. I realize any potential gearing advantage would be a course dependent issue but just wanted to see what the opinions are for B-stock.

I suppose this could possibly change things on the front axle for some folks as well. I am already rubbing the 245s some - probably due primarily to the wider offset of the OZ wheels so i doubt I would be able to make this work up front. I am considering it for the rear though. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
sirbunz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 2
Default

I wonder how this would work for the front. Maybe it would take some of the numbness out (or make worse) of the steering, help with fender liner clearance, etc. Im sure some will try it.

-Marc
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 12:58 PM
  #3  
Apeatwo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

This has me wondering if the 275 square will work for us standard ap2 guys.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 01:40 PM
  #4  
skahre's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Apeatwo
This has me wondering if the 275 square will work for us standard ap2 guys.
I am wondering the same thing but I figure I would probably need a narrower offset than the OZ wheels to make it work.

Jeff, you try it first and let me know if it works! HaHa!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
sirbunz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 2
Default

I wouldn't use this size on the rear simply because the AP2 gearing is short enough and has no clearance issues in the back.

-Marc
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2013 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
Apeatwo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Originally Posted by skahre
Originally Posted by Apeatwo' timestamp='1359583093' post='22303610
This has me wondering if the 275 square will work for us standard ap2 guys.
I am wondering the same thing but I figure I would probably need a narrower offset than the OZ wheels to make it work.

Jeff, you try it first and let me know if it works! HaHa!
I might try it Steve, I'm still on a set of OEM wheels so thats one less problem I might have. I'm with Marc too, I'd stick with the 275/40 out back, I don't want to run out of 2nd gear any faster than I do now.

So whats to be gained? Although significantly wider, what is the end result width of tread after being pinched down on the 7" wheel? How do the 3.79" sidewall (275) and 3.86" sidewall of the 40 series compare in driveability? Is the slightly shorter height negated by the additional cupping of the tire?

hmm, maybe I won't bother trying.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #7  
skahre's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Apeatwo
Originally Posted by skahre' timestamp='1359585637' post='22303743
[quote name='Apeatwo' timestamp='1359583093' post='22303610']
This has me wondering if the 275 square will work for us standard ap2 guys.
I am wondering the same thing but I figure I would probably need a narrower offset than the OZ wheels to make it work.

Jeff, you try it first and let me know if it works! HaHa!
I might try it Steve, I'm still on a set of OEM wheels so thats one less problem I might have. I'm with Marc too, I'd stick with the 275/40 out back, I don't want to run out of 2nd gear any faster than I do now.

So whats to be gained? Although significantly wider, what is the end result width of tread after being pinched down on the 7" wheel? How do the 3.79" sidewall (275) and 3.86" sidewall of the 40 series compare in driveability? Is the slightly shorter height negated by the additional cupping of the tire?

hmm, maybe I won't bother trying.
[/quote]
I guess I will stay with the same old staggered setup. If you decide to try it, I am definitely interested to hear how it works out. You have a good point that the shorter sidewall will make the tire pinch even worse that the 40 series, which is already getting pinched down a bunch to get a 275 on a 7" wheel.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2013 | 05:38 PM
  #8  
josh7owens's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,340
Likes: 0
From: Frankfort, KY
Default

If you are a baller I suppose people could have two sets and choose between each depending on how fast the course will be. A tight course that kept the speeds under 61mph may be faster with the shorter tire due to less rotating mass and a more favortable gear ratio. On the other hand as some noted the pintching the the shorter sidewall tire may cause "issues".
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #9  
sirbunz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by skahre
Originally Posted by Apeatwo' timestamp='1359674282' post='22306451
[quote name='skahre' timestamp='1359585637' post='22303743']
[quote name='Apeatwo' timestamp='1359583093' post='22303610']
This has me wondering if the 275 square will work for us standard ap2 guys.
I am wondering the same thing but I figure I would probably need a narrower offset than the OZ wheels to make it work.

Jeff, you try it first and let me know if it works! HaHa!
I might try it Steve, I'm still on a set of OEM wheels so thats one less problem I might have. I'm with Marc too, I'd stick with the 275/40 out back, I don't want to run out of 2nd gear any faster than I do now.

So whats to be gained? Although significantly wider, what is the end result width of tread after being pinched down on the 7" wheel? How do the 3.79" sidewall (275) and 3.86" sidewall of the 40 series compare in driveability? Is the slightly shorter height negated by the additional cupping of the tire?

hmm, maybe I won't bother trying.
[/quote]
I guess I will stay with the same old staggered setup. If you decide to try it, I am definitely interested to hear how it works out. You have a good point that the shorter sidewall will make the tire pinch even worse that the 40 series, which is already getting pinched down a bunch to get a 275 on a 7" wheel.
[/quote]

Maybe, maybe not. The bead may be larger to allow the tire to sit further out on the wheel with the smaller sidewall ... or it may be shorter and pinch the tire more. Back in the day, I noticed my v710s has a smaller inner bead on the 275s than made it pinch more on the 8.5" wheel compared to the 275 A6s. We wont know until someone tries this. In general, Hoosier makes these tires to fit smaller wheels. Some more than others.

-Marc
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2013 | 05:08 AM
  #10  
Apeatwo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Ok, another quick thought. Right now, the only thing keeping me from running the 275/40 up front is the spring rate, whereas a CR has enough. Is -.2" in height enough to make up that difference?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 AM.