350z vs s2000
Originally Posted by FanBoiControl,Jan 7 2006, 09:13 PM
At higher speeds weight really doesn't matter anymore so no surprise the more powerful vehicle starts to pull around 80. S2000 definitely isn't geared for higher speeds either.
Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Jan 7 2006, 10:49 PM
I would be embarassed if I ever lost to a stock 350z in my s2k.
lets not go the route of the other thread...the Z is just as respectable a car as the S. Losing to one is all in context (read speed the race started at).
Originally Posted by 00S2KFAN,Jan 7 2006, 09:55 PM
lets not go the route of the other thread...the Z is just as respectable a car as the S. Losing to one is all in context (read speed the race started at).
Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Jan 8 2006, 12:03 AM
true, but i'm not stock. So if I did loose to a stock one then I would drive my car over a cliff.
why is losing to a stock 350z embarrassing for a stock s2k...? a stock 350z is capable of crackint 13.5'z stock in the 1/4 mile. I dont think that its a slouch what so ever. there is no logic that u could use to justify your statement.
Originally Posted by Z33 KRN,Jan 8 2006, 01:14 AM
why is losing to a stock 350z embarrassing for a stock s2k...? a stock 350z is capable of crackint 13.5'z stock in the 1/4 mile. I dont think that its a slouch what so ever. there is no logic that u could use to justify your statement.
Originally Posted by Z33 KRN,Jan 8 2006, 01:14 AM
why is losing to a stock 350z embarrassing for a stock s2k...? a stock 350z is capable of crackint 13.5'z stock in the 1/4 mile. I dont think that its a slouch what so ever. there is no logic that u could use to justify your statement.


