S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

350z vs s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #11  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Originally Posted by FanBoiControl,Jan 7 2006, 09:13 PM
At higher speeds weight really doesn't matter anymore so no surprise the more powerful vehicle starts to pull around 80. S2000 definitely isn't geared for higher speeds either.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

I would be embarassed if I ever lost to a stock 350z in my s2k.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
cap1's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 167,324
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Nice runs!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #14  
00S2KFAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: McGregor
Default

Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Jan 7 2006, 10:49 PM
I would be embarassed if I ever lost to a stock 350z in my s2k.


lets not go the route of the other thread...the Z is just as respectable a car as the S. Losing to one is all in context (read speed the race started at).
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #15  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

Originally Posted by 00S2KFAN,Jan 7 2006, 09:55 PM


lets not go the route of the other thread...the Z is just as respectable a car as the S. Losing to one is all in context (read speed the race started at).
true, but i'm not stock. So if I did loose to a stock one then I would drive my car over a cliff.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #16  
00S2KFAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: McGregor
Default

Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Jan 8 2006, 12:03 AM
true, but i'm not stock. So if I did loose to a stock one then I would drive my car over a cliff.
yeah...my apologies as I read your sig after I posted lol
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2006 | 12:14 AM
  #17  
Z33 KRN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Palisades Park
Default

why is losing to a stock 350z embarrassing for a stock s2k...? a stock 350z is capable of crackint 13.5'z stock in the 1/4 mile. I dont think that its a slouch what so ever. there is no logic that u could use to justify your statement.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2006 | 12:27 AM
  #18  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

Originally Posted by Z33 KRN,Jan 8 2006, 01:14 AM
why is losing to a stock 350z embarrassing for a stock s2k...? a stock 350z is capable of crackint 13.5'z stock in the 1/4 mile. I dont think that its a slouch what so ever. there is no logic that u could use to justify your statement.
re-read what was said after that. there ya go
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2006 | 12:29 AM
  #19  
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Z33 KRN,Jan 8 2006, 01:14 AM
why is losing to a stock 350z embarrassing for a stock s2k...? a stock 350z is capable of crackint 13.5'z stock in the 1/4 mile. I dont think that its a slouch what so ever. there is no logic that u could use to justify your statement.
Would you care to show me some timeslips of a stock 350z hitting 13.5s? Just curious
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #20  
s2kpinoy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

its embarrassing for him b/c hes not stock. yea im curious too, any proof?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 AM.