S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Here is an interesting race site..

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 4, 2002 | 09:03 AM
  #1  
steve c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default Here is an interesting race site..

http://www.track-challenge.com/

No M BMW's but oddly enough the 3.0 liter non M Z3 Coupe was quicker around N
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2002 | 11:41 AM
  #2  
AzNRocKet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Au coeur de la Belle Province!
Default

I don't understand what they say...what is the language used???
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2002 | 12:04 PM
  #3  
DaveZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
From: Richmond
Default

Originally posted by AzNRocKet
I don't understand what they say...what is the language used???
German. You should be able to translate it with Babel Fish: http://world.altavista.com/
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2002 | 03:40 PM
  #4  
DavidM's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Excellent site, thanks for the link.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2002 | 04:34 AM
  #5  
DavidM's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

I got some more info on the Z3 3.0 vs S2000 as I found the "Sports Auto" issue where they compare S2000, Z3 3.0 and TT Roadster in the same test. On the 'same day, same conditions' the S2000 is slighlty quicker then the Z3 3.0 in the straighline (figures from the article, S2000 vs Z3 3.0):
0- 60kph = 3.0 vs 3.0
0- 80kph = 4.4 vs 4.4
0-100kph = 6.2 vs 6.3
0-120kph = 8.7 vs 8.6
0-160kph = 14.8 vs 15.3
0-180kph = 19.2 vs 19.9
0-200kph = 24.5 vs 27.4

So, as you can see, up to ~140kph there nothing between them but after that things go in the S2000's favour ... more so as speeds increase.

Slalom (18m):
- S2000 = 63.1kph
- Z3 3.0 = 62.6kph
- TT = 62.0kph

Braking 100 - 0kph (cold/warm):
- S2000 = 37.1/36.1m
- Z3 3.0 = 36.7/36.7m
- TT = 36.1/36.4m

Also, they took the cars to the Kleiner Kurs Hokeinheim track and the times were:
- S2000 = 1:18.9
- Z3 3.0 = 1:20.8
- TT = 1:21.3

So it looks like the Z3 3.0 is about the same as the S2000 in the straight-line acceleration but gives a bit in the ultimate track-speed.

ps. This test was done at 24 degrees Celcius (ground = 26).
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #6  
AzNRocKet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Au coeur de la Belle Province!
Default

Originally posted by DavidM
I got some more info on the Z3 3.0 vs S2000 as I found the "Sports Auto" issue where they compare S2000, Z3 3.0 and TT Roadster in the same test. On the 'same day, same conditions' the S2000 is slighlty quicker then the Z3 3.0 in the straighline (figures from the article, S2000 vs Z3 3.0):
0- 60kph = 3.0 vs 3.0
0- 80kph = 4.4 vs 4.4
0-100kph = 6.2 vs 6.3
0-120kph = 8.7 vs 8.6
0-160kph = 14.8 vs 15.3
0-180kph = 19.2 vs 19.9
0-200kph = 24.5 vs 27.4

So, as you can see, up to ~140kph there nothing between them but after that things go in the S2000's favour ... more so as speeds increase.

Slalom (18m):
- S2000 = 63.1kph
- Z3 3.0 = 62.6kph
- TT = 62.0kph

Braking 100 - 0kph (cold/warm):
- S2000 = 37.1/36.1m
- Z3 3.0 = 36.7/36.7m
- TT = 36.1/36.4m

Also, they took the cars to the Kleiner Kurs Hokeinheim track and the times were:
- S2000 = 1:18.9
- Z3 3.0 = 1:20.8
- TT = 1:21.3

So it looks like the Z3 3.0 is about the same as the S2000 in the straight-line acceleration but gives a bit in the ultimate track-speed.

ps. This test was done at 24 degrees Celcius (ground = 26).
Interesting stats ya brought there bro!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2002 | 01:11 AM
  #7  
bayarea408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,594
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

argH!!! ENGLISH please
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LewKeim
S2000 Street Encounters
1
Jun 29, 2001 11:44 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 AM.