S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Me vs 355 vs GNX...

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #11  
S4KiD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Stock they are making 200HP with 300Ft pounds. The info below is from Fast Cars .net



"The increased performance of the 1987 model year is also more attractive to performance enthusiasts. The Grand National was tested at 13.85 sec @ 99 mph in the 1/4 mile, and a relatively quick sprint to sixty mph took just over six seconds. This made the Grand National capable of out-pacing most of the cars produced during that time and certainly competitive in today's era of cars."
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #12  
Venomous S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 4
From: Barkhamsted
Default

I dont know what their times are exactly but I raced one and im assuming it was stock, but from 60mph and up I would end up pulling majorly, and once we hit about 110 or so it was over him
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 09:03 PM
  #13  
yellafeva's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
From: Twilight Zone
Default

Those cars are/were extremely ugly. And like most cars of that era, it handled like a semi-truck. Sure they were fast, but any car can be made fast. I don't mean this to be offensive, but that car, to me, is the epitome of a white trash car.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 01:30 AM
  #14  
wadswoaj's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Can a GNX turn corners?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 05:14 AM
  #15  
S4KiD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by yellafeva
Those cars are/were extremely ugly.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 08:40 AM
  #16  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by yellafeva
Those cars are/were extremely ugly.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #17  
Ace10's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: NoVa
Default

the buick grand national was the original blown buick regal... the gnx was a factory enhanced version of the grand antional. they are not the same. the equivalent today would the the wrx and the sti.

my guess is that the S would take the grand national (in stock form) on any point to point staright line challenge, while the gnx would stick it to the S.

the gnx was one quick beast. while the grand national was only slightly quicker than the regal with a 305 and a 4 barrel carb.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 09:06 AM
  #18  
sirrach's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Salem, NH
Default

my friend had a GN with 985 hp, but it wasn't a GNX. Sadly he totalled it at the track
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #19  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by sirrach
my friend had a GN with 985 hp, but it wasn't a GNX.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 07:17 AM
  #20  
sirrach's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Salem, NH
Default

yea he told me the turbo's themselves were like 15g's, I never saw the car as I met him after he totalled it, but everyone who saw it said it was just sick.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 PM.