S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

04 S2000 vs 07 S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:33 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
FASTER420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: belmont CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 04 S2000 vs 07 S2000

Ok Hi everybody i just bought a 2007 s2000 and i put a cold air intake,70mm berks test pipe and a none name brand carbon fiber cannister from like ebay because i really did not have alot of money to buy one and 2.5 inch none mandrel bend piping from the cannister back to the test pipe and theres a resonator between the cannister and the test pipe because it was too loud,Ok heres my question my bubby has an 04 S2000 and all he has is aem cold air intake and everything else is stock and everytime we race,were always even,its just that mine is louder than his,i dont get it,shouldnt i be beating him by at least by a car or two,or is it maybe what im putting on my car thats whats making it slower,i read that his year weighs less than mine,i went to go weigh my car at one of those city dump places and with no spare tire or tools and a full tank of gas it weighed 2960 with me in it i weigh about 150 pounds,but my buddy told me that his car weighs like 2700 pounds and when we raced he had a quarter tank of gas and i had a full one,was it because he is lighter,i read that my year puts out
237 HP SAE @ 7,800 rpm; 162 ft lb , 220 Nm @ 6,800 rpm and his year puts out 240 HP SAE @ 7,800 rpm; 162 ft lb , 220 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
is it because he has 3 more HP than me and so when i did the mods it just evened us up,i dont know,im just guessing here,does anybody have an explantion for this and if so please let me know,i keep thinking theres something wrong with my s2000
Old 03-08-2010, 04:36 PM
  #2  
Registered User

 
SeanSerino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Traction control, drive by wire, and slightly different seats and radio starts 06+. I believe.
Old 03-08-2010, 05:08 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
2slow2Bfurious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hp is rated the same for all s2000, 2000-2009, 237 after they changed how they measure hp, but all s2000 are rated at 237(usdm).
Old 03-08-2010, 05:20 PM
  #4  
Registered User

 
dammitjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Read the faq and meow use paragraphs.























Old 03-08-2010, 05:20 PM
  #5  

 
zeroptzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 25,484
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,509 Posts
Default

if you think bolting on a bunch of aftermarket parts is going to make your car much faster than a stock setup, save your money. Honda engineers spent a lot of time piecing these parts together to get the kind of output the car has. Putting in hap hazard parts could make the car slower at worst, probably not much faster at best. Chances are your friend could have kept up with you even if he had a stock intake. It takes a lot of money to make a difference on these cars and it takes quality dyno proven tuned parts as well. The intake, header, catalytic converter, and exhaust systems on these cars flow very well in NA form.

The three hp difference in advertised specs is just a recalibration of the power output , there is no difference in output between those years despite the different advertised rates.

In order to gain a length or two over your buddies car is going to take some decent coin, buying some expensive parts.
Old 03-08-2010, 05:53 PM
  #6  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
FASTER420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: belmont CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@ seanserino's answer,thats what i was thinking too about the drive by wire and that traction control thing,because the first two we raced he took me out by two cars and the third time we ran i took that traction control thing off and we were even LOL

@ JFUSION ,your right im just going to have buy really expensive parts to get some decent HP out of my N/A but i really didnt want to do that beacuse im saving up to go turbo by next year.hopefully LOL.
Old 03-08-2010, 06:01 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
craig2teg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FASTER420,Mar 8 2010, 09:53 PM
@ JFUSION ,your right im just going to have buy really expensive parts to get some decent HP out of my N/A but i really didnt want to do that beacuse im saving up to go turbo by next year.hopefully LOL.
Then why waste your $ on n/a parts if you plan going fi in the long run?
Old 03-08-2010, 06:13 PM
  #8  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
FASTER420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: belmont CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im just going to continue saving for my turbo kit.
Old 03-08-2010, 06:14 PM
  #9  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

OMG, that was painful to read. You should worry about getting a good education more than whose S2000 is faster.
Old 03-08-2010, 06:17 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
s2k>wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is OP serious lol


Quick Reply: 04 S2000 vs 07 S2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 PM.