2.0 vs 2.2
I am curious about how many people really drive their cars hard enough to produce the 5.5 sec 0 to 60. What I would like to see compared is side by side. driving at speeds we all use, back roads passing 50 to 80 or 90. or 25 to 75 merging into traffic. I find myself playing with mustangs, corvettes, etc.. on the highway from 75 to 100+. Anyone ever do these comparisons?
Originally Posted by nalVle' date='Feb 21 2005, 11:02 AM
i would rather own the 9k motor; its more worth it than an extra 9 ft/lbs of torque, and a couple more ponies on the dyno.
-Chris
-Chris
Thanks for opening up a can of warms...
jk.
Both are great engine. Although 2.2L is advertised for same HP out put, torque and actual HP figures should be higher than 2.0L engine.
Rest of the world gets 2.0L only in NA market 2.2L was introduced. As far as which being faster argument goes?
Who cares about 0-60 or 1/4mile time. Take it to a road track. It becomes driver's game.
jk.Both are great engine. Although 2.2L is advertised for same HP out put, torque and actual HP figures should be higher than 2.0L engine.
Rest of the world gets 2.0L only in NA market 2.2L was introduced. As far as which being faster argument goes?
Who cares about 0-60 or 1/4mile time. Take it to a road track. It becomes driver's game.
Originally Posted by Jay2000' date='Feb 21 2005, 02:40 PM
I am curious about how many people really drive their cars hard enough to produce the 5.5 sec 0 to 60.
[QUOTE]What I would like to see compared is side by side. driving at speeds we all use,
Originally Posted by TSuzukaB' date='Feb 21 2005, 04:58 PM
Just get one of each and alternate driving between the two!!!! I drive the 03 one week and the 05 the next week....they both have their own characteristics. 

Thanks for all the input guys. I guess you can't go wrong with either car. I can't wait to get one, I'm saving my pennies!
Originally Posted by Jay2000' date='Feb 21 2005, 03:40 PM
I am curious about how many people really drive their cars hard enough to produce the 5.5 sec 0 to 60. What I would like to see compared is side by side. driving at speeds we all use, back roads passing 50 to 80 or 90. or 25 to 75 merging into traffic. I find myself playing with mustangs, corvettes, etc.. on the highway from 75 to 100+. Anyone ever do these comparisons?
i went with the 04 because it was new. that being said i didn't have much of a choice really. i do like the wheels of the older models better but i must say the interior of the 04's look quite a bit better. also the head/tailight assemblies look much better on the newer version.
since i've never driven a 00-03 i don't know what i'm missing with my wussy 8k redline but it seems that the 9k is the only real advantage i've heard as of yet.
isn't it interesting how the owners of their respective MY's seem to support their MY's? come on 00-03'ers let me have it!
since i've never driven a 00-03 i don't know what i'm missing with my wussy 8k redline but it seems that the 9k is the only real advantage i've heard as of yet.
isn't it interesting how the owners of their respective MY's seem to support their MY's? come on 00-03'ers let me have it!



