Another interesting review
Thread Starter
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land
Originally posted by Anthony
Did I read that right?
The stereo is better than the porsches? How bad is the porsche's stereo!
Quite a reasonable review in all,
Anthony
Did I read that right?
The stereo is better than the porsches? How bad is the porsche's stereo!
Quite a reasonable review in all,
Anthony
-Shing
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury
Same reaction on the stereo comment. The Porsche's stereo must suck really bad.
Pretty much the same conclusion as most other articles in this area. Bottom line (which we already know): The S2K is a driving/racing machine. It is not happy on the Interstate.
Pretty much the same conclusion as most other articles in this area. Bottom line (which we already know): The S2K is a driving/racing machine. It is not happy on the Interstate.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Originally posted by nwk00
The review is wrong. I used to own a Boxster, the stereo is so-so but definitely better than the S2000.
The review is wrong. I used to own a Boxster, the stereo is so-so but definitely better than the S2000.
Believe me, the base Boxster stereo truly sucks as bad as the S2000. The early becker head units where even worse, with buttons that where nearly impossible to hit without looking right at them, graphics that wore off the buttons, and very poor reliability.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ELAhrens
S2000 Vintage Owners
38
Jun 18, 2004 05:58 PM