S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

anyone install a hp meter

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #11  
dyhppy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

it was a joke, but at the same time, if it reads 240 hp and our cars weigh as little as it does, it means something substantial.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 09:37 PM
  #12  
kenstyle's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Default

Do we really need a hp meter for ALL ground-trembling 240 of our horses?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 05:37 AM
  #13  
QUIKAG's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by dyhppy,Nov 25 2006, 08:22 PM
it was a joke, but at the same time, if it reads 240 hp and our cars weigh as little as it does, it means something substantial.
Substantial? Our cars are basically 2,850lbs. That's not THAT light. Our power to weight ratio is nothing to brag about nowadays.

I am satisfied with my S2000's acceleration, but I know for a fact that it's not that fast. I had a modded C5 beforehand and it was much, much faster. The S2000 is a blast to drive, but not because of it's acceleration.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 06:06 AM
  #14  
stocky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,465
Likes: 0
From: the tracks around Europe
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Nov 26 2006, 02:37 PM
Substantial? Our cars are basically 2,850lbs. That's not THAT light. Our power to weight ratio is nothing to brag about nowadays.

I am satisfied with my S2000's acceleration, but I know for a fact that it's not that fast. I had a modded C5 beforehand and it was much, much faster. The S2000 is a blast to drive, but not because of it's acceleration.
TRue that....but you know some people are still all about HP !
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 06:08 AM
  #15  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

A HP meter is gay and probably inaccurate. What if your engine isn't running right? Is it still going to spit out the same HP readings based on RPM?

To have a truely functional meter, you'd need an onboard dyno, which would add weight/complexity, take a lot of space, and create a lot of drag.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #16  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,Nov 26 2006, 07:08 AM
A HP meter is gay and probably inaccurate. What if your engine isn't running right? Is it still going to spit out the same HP readings based on RPM?

To have a truely functional meter, you'd need an onboard dyno, which would add weight/complexity, take a lot of space, and create a lot of drag.
The one on the Veyron is completely accurate.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #17  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by dyhppy,Nov 24 2006, 11:25 PM
the veyron has one and thought it would be cool.
I know you're just foolin' around, and I find the idea of a "horsepower meter" a bit comical, but I do depend on measurements when I evaluate changes. How do you feel about measuring thrust with a three axis accelerometer and deriving WHP from the trust, measured test weight, and an appropriate correction factor?

I started out my career working on inertial navigation systems that use a "stable table" and three axis accelerometers, way back in the 60's, and even then accelerometer data was far more accurate than any dyno, so I put a lot of faith in my thrust measurements. If a flat test area is available accurate measurements can be made with only one accelerometer, as long as HP is all one wants to measure. The advantage of using accelerometers over a dyno is that in the long term it's a lot cheaper, and it provides a lot more information (because it also measures cornering forces, breaking forces, impacts, and so on). Butt dyno only works when you are blind, deaf, numb, and don't know that changes have been made, and even then, it's questionable.

My butt dyno says that my car is making at least 400 WHP, but only in first gear.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #18  
dyhppy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

funny stuff
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #19  
mister x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 6
From: Honolulu
Default

I remember when some people thought vacuum gauges were absolutely vital.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #20  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by mister x,Nov 27 2006, 08:32 PM
I remember when some people thought vacuum gauges were absolutely vital.
At least a vacuum gauge measures something that isn't already being measured by other gauges, but "vital?" I think vacuum gauges were popular because along with the amp meter and oil pressure meter, they were the cheapest gauges, and the easiest to install.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bubsie007
S2000 Under The Hood
2
Sep 16, 2012 06:21 PM
GrandMasterKhan
S2000 Under The Hood
19
Jun 18, 2008 12:48 PM
honda38
S2000 Forced Induction
16
Nov 14, 2006 01:35 PM
HeLLSpiRE
Prairie Redliners
1
Aug 19, 2002 11:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 AM.