S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

anyone tried using regular gas in the S2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 24, 2002 | 11:37 PM
  #1  
toecheese's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 14
From: Los Angeles
Default

I see the owners manual says that if premium gas isn't available, that it's OK to use regular and that the engine will compensate but with less HP. Has anyone tried using 87 and/or 89 octane gas? What were your results?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2002 | 11:59 PM
  #2  
Schatten's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,936
Likes: 2
From: Austin
Default

it does work fine. no detonation, no issues really. just less performance. just not recommended.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 12:04 AM
  #3  
axcilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Near The Ocean
Default

With low octane fuel I would not only worry about less HP, but what would occur when the engine was put into VTEC or TRUE VTEC (9000 RPM). If you were going to run out of gas and 87 was the only way to get to a 92 or 93 octane station. IMHO only in emergency situations would I use low octane fuel.

As a daily driver, even though the cost may be $.10 to $.15 more a gallon, the S 2000 with premium fuel is the only way to be driven.

Just My $.02

axcilla
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 05:53 AM
  #4  
wickerbill's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Do you really want to take the chance with your car to save a dollar or two with each fillup? Sitting in hot weather in stop and go traffic is probably some of the worst conditions for detonation and having a low octane fuel is not going to help.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 06:15 AM
  #5  
pfb's Avatar
pfb
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Default

I thought the S2000 had a knock sensor?

If so, lower octane fuel would at worst cause some additional timing retard and loss of performance, but no harm to the engine.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 06:38 AM
  #6  
wickerbill's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by pfb
[B]I thought the S2000 had a knock sensor?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 08:14 AM
  #7  
Destiny2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 2
From: Transporter
Default

Well when your gas mileage gets worse it makes no financial sense to switch to low octane.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 08:17 AM
  #8  
GeneB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Euless, TX
Default

I always alternate fill-ups at the mid tank level- alternating between 93 and 89. Should give me the 91 octane I'm looking for w/o wasting money on extra octane.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 08:26 AM
  #9  
Nixlimited's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

I think the lower gas mileage produced by lower octane fuels will erase any savings from buying the cheaper fuel. As with most all things....you get what you pay for.

Nix
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2002 | 08:30 AM
  #10  
Ernie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury
Default

I have heard this question asked regularly in newspaper columns on many car types. I always remember Jim Mateja of Chicago Tribune saying " Why do you buy an expensive car and then worry about price of gas?" Everyone is different but my feeling is it is not a big deal with 10 gallon fillups. I would have bought an Insight if I worried about gas mileage.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM.