S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

AP1 VTEC engagement point.

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #31  
RED MX5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by S2-3456789-K,Sep 19 2007, 09:13 PM
http://www.hondahookup.com/info/vtec.php

this article also supports that vtec engagement/disengagement is dependent on several variables/inputs.

btw, by my saying that throttle position is a variable, i'm not implying that you need to be in WOT.
Thanks for the dyno plots.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 07:08 PM
  #32  
S2-3456789-K's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Default

red, for some reason i get the feeling that you're a BIG fan of the centrifugal SC

i trust your experience with the shop manual/testing vtec, and yes it's good to have those factual pieces of information.

i'm not familiar with the actual vtec control system, but i'm almost positive that it's some kind of feedback control system. it might take a honda engineer who is familiar with the design to tell us exactly how that control system works...which kinda makes me want to work for honda! hopefully the honda plant in ohio will need an electrical engineer in the near future!
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #33  
RED MX5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE=S2-3456789-K,Sep 19 2007, 10:08 PM]red, for some reason i get the feeling that you're a BIG fan of the centrifugal SC
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #34  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by S2-3456789-K,Sep 19 2007, 02:58 PM
^^ isn't vtec disengagement at a lower rpm than vtec engagement? what i'm saying is that from what i've read, vtec engagement and disengagement go through a feedback control system that depend on several inputs including throttle position, rpm, and some other factors. also, i read that in the ap1, shifting into 2nd gear drops you below 6k rpm but based on some of the inputs mentioned earlier, vtec is not disengaged and then engaged again once 6k rpm is reached in 2nd gear.

from experience, when i shift into 2nd, i don't feel a sudden lack of power followed by a sudden gain jump in power.

just my 2 cents of course
I say that throttle position is almost not a factor, as the necessary throttle position will change depending on engine speed and therefore oil pressure. Kind of along the same lines as including Time Since Engine Startup as a condition. The amount of time the car has been running is not really wants important, being at normal operating temperature is which comes as a result of the car running for a certain amount of time.

The minimum conditions will have to be constants and not variable based on other factors.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 11:32 PM
  #35  
S2oooNvegas's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Enthralled,Sep 19 2007, 02:39 AM
I'm not sure about you guys, but my VTEC kicks in at 4.5K BTW I have an APDeuce.
be careful with that, unless your inside the factory ecu, turning it on that early, doesnt help at all. the stock setup also amplify's the spark voltage on vtec engagement. so if your turning it on without enough oil pressure, possible damage, and without the spark voltage increase, and fuel trims up, all you get is a bunch of noise, and or a huge lean spot.
but hey, just FYI. lates
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #36  
Pointblank's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,980
Likes: 0
From: Harbor City, CA
Default

I'm pretty sure it's 6200rpm
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #37  
Neutered Sputniks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,712
Likes: 1
Default

Perhaps the difference in altitude is causing a difference in oil pressure? At a higher altitude, the oil would not necessarily reach the needed pressure for VTEC engagement till higher RPMs are reached.

This accounts for the shop manual as well as the difference in VTEC engagement at altitude.

I'd have to do the math to figure out how much of an oil pressure difference would be seen at altitude vs sea level.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 03:11 AM
  #38  
YoZUpZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

[QUOTE=S2K-F8,Sep 18 2007, 09:14 PM] Here at 5280ft above sea level my VTEC doesn't engage til about 6.5k.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 05:26 AM
  #39  
trinis2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean - Trinidad
Default

Originally Posted by Pointblank,Sep 20 2007, 04:15 AM
I'm pretty sure it's 6200rpm
I recall somewhere that the offical VTEC engagement point for the F20C is 5850 RPM. My dyno plot (more or less at sea level) concurs with this too.


RMX5 - My Shop (Service) Manual says this about testing VTEC engagement:

1. Reset the ECM....

2. Check engine oil level....

3. Warm up to normal operating temp.....

4. ROAD test the vehicle:
Accelerate in 1st gear to an engine speed over 6,000 rpm. Hold for at least 2 seconds.....

This (ROAD test) does lend credit to the fact that at least in the B16A engines, VTEC will not engage if the engine is not under load. They say ROAD test and not just rev at rest. There is no reason why VTEC should or would engage at any RPM if not under load.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 05:44 AM
  #40  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

[QUOTE=mxt_77,Sep 19 2007, 09:33 AM] The last time this debate came up, someone (Elistan, I think) mentioned that he has seen late VTEC when driving at high altitudes.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 AM.