S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Best year of s2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 9, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #111  
Artric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Deltona, FL
Default

04-05 have all of the best features, and all of the downsides can easily be remedied

-can reflash the ECU for higher, safe redline 8500+ totally safe
-can swap parts to allow for reflash, if desired
-softer springs nice for DD, but super simple to swap to anything else
-same with sway bars
-suffers from CDV, but it can be easily removed
-offers right colors to allow for CR parts swap without paint

things that cannot so easily be remedied
-lower displacement
-dbw throttle
-tps sensors
-plastic rear window
-two color seats (if you're not a fan)
-burning oil on earlier years
-weaker diff on earlier years

EDIT: I do have to give it to the AP1 as far as gearing, but I'd take the improved transmission over one with better gearing.

It also comes with nice wide wheels, as a bonus over AP1 - no need to go aftermarket. Plus you can get fantastic deals on them and they're usually in much better shape than the older cars.

That's JMHO but of course there are tons of opinions around here.
Old May 9, 2009 | 08:20 AM
  #112  
ITRbroham's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Socal, CA
Default

MY02 or 03
Old May 9, 2009 | 08:25 AM
  #113  
pdexta's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 19
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

2002 White w/ all red interior
Old May 9, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #114  
Bob A (SD)'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 646
Likes: 7
From: Black Hills of S. Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by negcamber,May 7 2009, 09:14 PM
Other countries tax cars with more than 2 liters at a higher rate...sorta like the US gas guzzler tax. It actually plays a big role in determining what displacement car manufacturers use. In fact, for many years Ferrari offered turbo 2liter versions of the 308 for sale in Europe.
neg,

Thanks for that. I had no idea that there was a 2 liter threshold. Makes a lot of sense.
Old May 9, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #115  
funat9000rpm's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,208
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta, Ga
Default

MY01, I own it
Old May 9, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #116  
negcamber's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 5
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Artric,May 9 2009, 10:49 AM
04-05 have all of the best features, and all of the downsides can easily be remedied

-can reflash the ECU for higher, safe redline 8500+ totally safe
-can swap parts to allow for reflash, if desired
-softer springs nice for DD, but super simple to swap to anything else

things that cannot so easily be remedied
-weaker diff on earlier years
Very logical reasons (except maybe the color one for CR swap...that one is a little strange )

Couple points though...

04-05 ECU can't be reflashed...only 06+

Swapping the ap1 diff for a very marginally stronger ap2 diff is a breeze (easier than installing stiffer springs on an ap2) and costs less than a cheap set of coilovers.
Old May 9, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #117  
30r Dreams's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR
Default

Best year is subjective, it depends on what you're looking for. I still think MY03 is the best followed by 05.

The slower steering rack in the AP2 just killed it for me, definately not an upgrade in any form. The F22 is much smoother and drives alot better, but 9k is pure aural pleasure. Aesthetically MY04-05 owns all, especially the interior and wheels.

MY00-01 is the most enjoyable to drive and has the most "raw" feeling of any year (excluding the CR). MY03 is nearly as fun to drive and has some of the much needed improvements.

To say that every revision made on the S2000 was an improvement is foolish. Many changes were made to improve practicality and comfort, along with broadening its appeal in the market.



Old May 9, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #118  
sirbunz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 2
Default

[QUOTE=ZDan,May 9 2009, 02:16 AM] Road & Track's CR, without A/C or radio, weighed 2790 lb., presumably without fuel (that's how they normally present curb weights).
Old May 9, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #119  
sirbunz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by negcamber,May 9 2009, 05:00 AM
Blue wire in position A19.

Thanks, will check with the guy who installed my unit and the manufacturer. I want to make sure these things are reading right.
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #120  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by sirbunz,May 10 2009, 12:52 AM
I will agree that the weight differences are not enough to matter. I'm also a heavier driver than most of my competition so much of the weight saving is lost. I believe the CR is the lightest and have used the proper methods of testing that. What research have you done? You have quoted me some numbers we all can find on the net?
But you have a race-prepped S2000. Not exactly normal or applicable to most S2000 owners. Stock numbers are well known and posted by Honda.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:55 PM.