S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Cold Gas

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 02:49 PM
  #11  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by slalom44,Oct 4 2007, 04:14 PM
The benefit of cooling the gas is insignificant to the benefit to cooling the air intake. Here's why:

Gasoline is a liquid. The specific heat of gasoline is relatively low - about half of the specific heat of water. That means that cooling a gallon of gas requires half as much energy removal as a gallon of water.

But gasoline combusts as a gas, not a liquid. To get the vaporized gas one degree colder, you would have to reduce the temperature of liquid gasoline by over 200 degrees!

On top of that, Air is only 21% oxygen. Almost one fifth of the air is Nitrogen, which doesn't burn. That means that you would have to cool the gasoline vapor five times as much to get the same effect as cooling the air.
Well covered!

Now I'll start work on my Nitrogen air filter so I don't have any of that pesky non-combustible air entering my engine.

Sooooo you're saying a little ice pack on a fuel rail, or cooling element in the tank wouldn't drop the temp 200 degrees? I'm sure you're right. The problem as well is, even if you could super-cool the gasoline, there is too much water in the crappy gas available, and you'd pontentially have freezing in the lines. On the other hand, if you used freezing to seperate the water from the gas I would think you're creating a better fuel! We should all go home and throw some gerry cans in the freezer.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #12  
CalBear07's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by slalom44,Oct 4 2007, 03:14 PM
On top of that, Air is only 21% oxygen. Almost one fifth of the air is Nitrogen, which doesn't burn. That means that you would have to cool the gasoline vapor five times as much to get the same effect as cooling the air.
Air is actually about 78% Nitrogen
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #13  
Spectre48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

A couple of things popped into my head...

The density of air changes somewhat dramatically with temperature, since it is a gas. Gasoline density is nearly constant in comparison.

Another benefit of colder air over gas is that it takes up a much larger volumetric percentage of the mixture entering the cylinder.

There is also little time for the fuel to cool the air charge. This is because the fuel injectors are located so close to the cylinders.

Cooling of the gas would richen the fuel mixture, although insignificantly. If no extra air is added, this extra fuel will go to waste out of the tailpipe. Also, a richer air/fuel ratio will produce less power than a lean mixture to some extent.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #14  
dhayner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Default

What goes into the cylinder a mixture of air and gas. A mixture of air and cold gas is cooler than a mixture of air and warm gas. A cool mixture is more dense than a warm mixture. A cylinder full of cool, dense mixture has more molecules of oxygen and of hydrocarbons in it than one full of warm, less-dense mixture.

Those extra molecules release extra power.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #15  
frofro24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

The flashpoint is still the same no matter what the temp of the fuel is before detonation. Some race cars might have something to cool the fuel to help stablelize it, and help avoid early detonation.

I think the flashpoint of Gasoline is around -40'
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #16  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by rocrfella,Oct 4 2007, 02:40 PM
I was thinking of the opposite. I think we should heat it up so it burns better.
This is correct, in theory. Hot fuel will atomize better, and thus burn more completely. In practice it's not going to be a significant effect because the car wasn't designed for it.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
Yanahdi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Default

don't forget that the pressurization of fuel prior to it being sprayed into the combustion chamber will heat it up some as well. Also, gasses can generally be cooled much faster than liquids.

cool air is still better bang for the buck, literally.

When the fuel is aerosolized into the combustion chamber its going to have a lot more surface area present that will be exposed to the air, cooling the air would have a higher impact and be more efficient than cooling the fuel.

Interesting idea, but as for power I would think the gains would be almost negligible for the energy invested.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:46 AM
  #18  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

These things have been around forever, but they are for CARBURATED cars. Not recommended for cars with fuel injection.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 03:44 AM
  #19  
S2KPUDDYDAD's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 5 2007, 04:46 AM
These things have been around forever, but they are for CARBURATED cars. Not recommended for cars with fuel injection.
A lot of HotRods when I was a kid had a Maxwell House coffee can under the hood with a fuel line coil in it. They would go over to the Jack&Jill icecream Co. and get dry ice, then fill the can with it .....I'm old
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 04:27 AM
  #20  
duboseq's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Default

Does'nt the Space Shuttle and NASA keep fuel cold for launches?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 AM.