S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Cool s2000 video

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #11  
S2KBDub's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 3
Default

More body roll, less torque, and heavier than the Civic? Blasphemy!

All the V-Tec in the video makes me miss my S2000, which is put away for the winter. That sounds is addicting. I wish my TSX hit V-Tec like that.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 04:36 PM
  #12  
Rubn1out4GudLuk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,268
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

Don't forget that they mentioned the s2000 had a clumsier engine...WTF?...Really?!!!

30k in #'s is what? 40k in US currency?

That civic is a track weapon. I'd like for them to run the CR model against that civic.

Lets not forget that it's a civic that's about $40,000...Did you really expect a piece of junk for that kind of money?!!

Regular civic Si is what...$18,000-$20,000? I bet if I threw down $20,000 in my s2k it would outperform that civic in a heartbeat. That whole show was written to put that civic on a pedestal and bad mouth the s2000. They said lots of good about it most of the time but mentioned the drawbacks for maybe 5 seconds out of the whole segment(Interior quality feels too fragile and the suspension was incredibly stiff for daily driving).
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #13  
Spoon Fed's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 195
From: Up north eh...
Default

IBTL
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #14  
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Likes: 56
Default

My K20 EM2 (2004) civic that I had before the S2k was a track beast. It made 201whp/151trq compaired to the S2ks 210whp/14xtrq on the same dyno and weighed in at 2500lbs compaired to the S2ks 2800lbs. The suspension was setup very well and predictable, you could push the car to the limits and provoke oversteer through lifting the throttle or trail breaking on comand and could be stuffed into corners with utmost confidence. I was passing M roadsters, vetts, older 911s, just because of how hard the car could be pushed.

That being said I love my S2k. It is slower in every way than my civic was, but it is soooo much more fun, gets so many more looks on the street (not the oh look at that ricer look), and is way more comfortable and streetable than the civic was. If I had the $ and could stomach spending the time away from my wife on the track I would still have the civic. But I wanted something that we could both enjoy off the track and I could still have a good bit of fun with those couple of times I am able to make it to the track. The S2k is perfect for where I am at now in life.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #15  
luder_5555's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

well let someone profesionally tune the s and make it into a full on race car and see how it does,i like that civic, but really its like comparing my s2k to one that has been modded for track use, i'd get smoked all day long
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #16  
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Default

Originally Posted by Rubn1out4GudLuk,Dec 2 2008, 01:36 AM
That civic is a track weapon. I'd like for them to run the CR model against that civic.
The S2000 they tested has the same suspension setup as the JDM Type-S which, IIRC, is the same as the CR.

The stock S2000 is lacking the suspension and tyres with which to compete.

Intake, Exhaust, Coilovers, front and rear under braces, same tyres as the Mugen and the tables would be turned
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #17  
Rubn1out4GudLuk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,268
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by luder_5555,Dec 1 2008, 10:01 PM
well let someone profesionally tune the s and make it into a full on race car and see how it does,i like that civic, but really its like comparing my s2k to one that has been modded for track use, i'd get smoked all day long


I also agree w/ Hypersonik...Except of the Intake and exhaust additions I would add a mild(100-150hp) supercharger. As we all know, the F series motor doesn't reply to bolt on mods as well as a K series motor so it wouldn't be as beneficial to add an intake and exhaust as it would be to go mild boost.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 07:50 AM
  #18  
patinum's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,572
Likes: 18
From: Second City
Default

Originally Posted by Hypersonik,Dec 2 2008, 12:11 AM
The S2000 they tested has the same suspension setup as the JDM Type-S which, IIRC, is the same as the CR.

The stock S2000 is lacking the suspension and tyres with which to compete.

Intake, Exhaust, Coilovers, front and rear under braces, same tyres as the Mugen and the tables would be turned
Is the type-s/cr suspension an option there?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #19  
luder_5555's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

oh and i was wondering, why would they shut down this vid?

or was that just a ploy to get us to watch it?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #20  
nfty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Memphis_S2k,Dec 1 2008, 01:11 PM
i love the mugen! but, in all honesty, the s2000 is not as easy a car to drive. the potential of the s2000 with the right driver is more then that of the civic.

plain and simple, fwd cars are much more forgiving in the corners then a rwd car. and especially a s2000.

i like to tell people that my s2000 is a bit "sensitive" at times
Something easily obtained is simply not valued. Applies to panties as well as cars.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:59 AM.