Didn't like this review
You can reply back to him. Look to the right of the site and it should have a contact icon or something like that. I did.
Oh and the comment on telling him to haul ass or you will shoot him was hilarious! I couldn't stop laughing.
Oh and the comment on telling him to haul ass or you will shoot him was hilarious! I couldn't stop laughing.
Originally Posted by dmcfan,Mar 14 2005, 03:30 PM
You can reply back to him. Look to the right of the site and it should have a contact icon or something like that. I did.
Oh and the comment on telling him to haul ass or you will shoot him was hilarious! I couldn't stop laughing.
Oh and the comment on telling him to haul ass or you will shoot him was hilarious! I couldn't stop laughing.

I swear, I think reading the articles off that site have made my dumber.
It's pretty obvious, that site is geared towards automobile consumers, not car drivers. These are the kind of people that believe cars are simply modes of transportation and nothing else.
The way this quack describes manual tranny's just completely dumbfounds me. I'm surprised that there isn't an article saying that rear-wheel drives are inherently unsafe and totally 20th century. I would just love for the guys from Car And Driver and Road And Track to pay a visit to the writers for that site. While every single author from those respected magazines (who are true car enthusiasts) bemoans the demise of the manual tranny, the quacks from that site actually celebrate it. Heck, why even bother steering for that matter! Stepping on the gas and brake pedals are so old school too. Here's a great idea of those writers: Public Transportation!
They should make it illegal for those guys to even get handed keys to sports cars. Or any car for that matter! They should quit reviewing cars and start reviewing toasters or something.
I thought that tabloids were junk and tabloid writers were the lowest form of journalistic writing. Now you guys have opened my eyes and shown me what true journalistic crap really is.
It's pretty obvious, that site is geared towards automobile consumers, not car drivers. These are the kind of people that believe cars are simply modes of transportation and nothing else.
The way this quack describes manual tranny's just completely dumbfounds me. I'm surprised that there isn't an article saying that rear-wheel drives are inherently unsafe and totally 20th century. I would just love for the guys from Car And Driver and Road And Track to pay a visit to the writers for that site. While every single author from those respected magazines (who are true car enthusiasts) bemoans the demise of the manual tranny, the quacks from that site actually celebrate it. Heck, why even bother steering for that matter! Stepping on the gas and brake pedals are so old school too. Here's a great idea of those writers: Public Transportation!
They should make it illegal for those guys to even get handed keys to sports cars. Or any car for that matter! They should quit reviewing cars and start reviewing toasters or something.
I thought that tabloids were junk and tabloid writers were the lowest form of journalistic writing. Now you guys have opened my eyes and shown me what true journalistic crap really is.







