does the S lose structural rigidity as it ages?
#11
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GPWonTan,Jul 3 2006, 12:29 PM
are u sayin xbrace will help keep the structure rigidity?
#12
Registered User
Originally Posted by Ks320,Jul 3 2006, 09:33 AM
That's what I feel -- keep in mind I do not have any real technical background in mechanical engineering though.
Another question that comes from this is if the X-brace puts more stress on other parts of the car that weren't designed for the additional stress.
#13
Originally Posted by Tyraid2K,Jul 3 2006, 09:33 AM
You need to run a "rigidity refresher" its only $30,000 in Gran Turismo and it should help a lot! Then you'll be able to beat that pesky Elise in the Tuner Championship! CURSE HIM!
LOL
LOL
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The structure itself will no loose the ridgidity with time. However, other parts like suspension, body panels, interior panels does get loose with time and hence it make the car feel looser. But the handling should remain like new as long as you are running fresh suspension.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ks320,Jul 3 2006, 12:33 PM
That's what I feel -- keep in mind I do not have any real technical background in mechanical engineering though.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hilton Head Island
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, goodness, loss of rigidity with aging is not a subject this 67 year old guy likes to approach. I would bet that what is perceived as loss of rigidity in an S2000 is most likely wear and tear on bushings, shocks and other suspension components. The frame is steel, and absent serious rusting or traumatic damage, I would be inclined to think that its characteristics are essentially permanent, i.e., various bending moments and resonant frequencies should be absolutely constant.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RED MX5,Jul 3 2006, 04:15 PM
Looking at the high X-bone frame I have a hard time seeing how an X brace is going to make a difference in rigidity.
There is nothing that truly runs diagnally in the frame. Please bear with my lack of technical vocab here; the car does not only flex in the front/back or right left direction. When a car takes a hard corner, I would imagine that the frame of the car flexes in the manner that's similar to that of a paper, when you hold the top right corner and bottom left corner and twist the corners in opposite directions. Imagine building a square frame out of chopsticks, and then put two more chopsticks diagnally, you'd feel that the latter feels harder to "twist" per se (of course, provided that you are gluing the corners together).
Anyway, again, my lack of technical background may not help in the subject matter, and may point to the wrong conclusion. I actally am curious to find out about this myself as well. Every time I drive over crappy roads I wish that I had the X-brace to keep things in one piece (not putting it on so I can take the baby to AutoX). If the X-brace doesn't help ... then I guess it'd make me feel better
#19
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chuhsi,Jul 3 2006, 02:08 PM
Another question that comes from this is if the X-brace puts more stress on other parts of the car that weren't designed for the additional stress.
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Ks320,Jul 3 2006, 04:41 PM]I was just thinking the X-brace would "tie things up" better in the front, since there isn't really anything that goes around the X-brace area except for the bar that sits in the front-most area of the frame in the image in your link.