S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

drop in mpg with the top down???

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #11  
STL's Avatar
STL
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by lanbrown
[B] In a car with a fixed roof, if you open the window you generate more drag.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #12  
STL's Avatar
STL
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by mns2k
[B]I have noticed that my MPG's go up as the weather gets warmer.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 09:59 AM
  #13  
lanbrown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Farmington Hills
Default

Of course it is true. Most vehicles have a CAFE requirement and the automakers want to get the highest MPG they can, so they spend some time with aerodynamics.

Obviously speed is a huge factor, as if you are stopped, having the window down takes less fuel then sitting there with the AC on. Define city areas; some areas have a speed limit of 45 or 50. Compare that to rush hour traffic on an expressway that is bumper to bumper.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #14  
STL's Avatar
STL
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally posted by lanbrown
Of course it is true.
Have any links or references to proof? How are you so sure that the load put on the car in the form of drag (with windows being down) is more than the load put on the car by the AC compressor? Just because you believe it does not make it true.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:10 PM
  #15  
STL's Avatar
STL
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Default

Just as I expected...nothing to back up the bold claims...
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 05:47 AM
  #16  
lanbrown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Farmington Hills
Default

http://www.aaa-calif.com/westways/1101/overdrive.asp

Aerodynamics, Part III. You've probably heard that using your air conditioner consumes extra gasoline. True, but not always. At low speeds, using the AC can cost you a couple of miles per gallon, says the API. Better to open the windows. At speeds over 40 mph, switch on the AC. The drag caused from open windows consumes more fuel than the AC. Better still, shut off the AC, close the windows, and use the fresh-air vents at high speeds.

Don't know about you, the only time I'm not doing 40 is when I'm stopped and many roads have speed limits faster then 40.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 03:40 PM
  #17  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by STL
[B]I've heard people say that too, but I have never seen anything halfway official to back up that claim.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #18  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by STL
[B]It has to do with the gas mixture.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #19  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

Originally posted by STL
Just as I expected...nothing to back up the bold claims...
Funny, STL, I don't see you posting a bunch of links in support of your position either. It's easy to make that kind of demand when someone disagrees with you on the web. I've noticed however, that most of the time, those who make such demands, rarely do the same for their POV.

How about it?

Drive Safe,
Steve R.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #20  
lanbrown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Farmington Hills
Default

Thank you Intrepid175. I was actually waiting for STL to say he wanted scientific proof and I was going to ask for proof that having the windows down didn't do anything.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 AM.