S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Dyno question

Thread Tools
 
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:19 PM
  #11  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default



That's what I said! I think the HP would be lost in generating the same amount of friction, but only faster.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #12  
RyanS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Incubus,May 6 2005, 12:36 PM
You'd have to look at how Honda originally arrived at their figure. Then, think about 17%...it sounds like a big percentage for drivetrain loss (but I could be wrong).

Barrett.
15-17% is typical for a manual tranny.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #13  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by RyanS2000,May 6 2005, 10:22 PM
15-17% is typical for a manual tranny.
Alright, I wasn't sure. Thanks!
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 05:32 AM
  #14  
Suzukaboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

The original question was xx% loss from CRANK to wheels.

If you had an engine on a stand and measured HP at the crankshaft, then modified it and rerun that test you would get an increase in horsepower which would include only internal friction losses in both cases. What the increase in internal engine friction caused by the mods is a good question. Another question is did the mods change the RPM at which the max HP was obtained.

Now supposing you dyno the same engine at the rear wheels before and after mods. I think the drive train losses(tranny, diff, shafts, rear wheel bearings, rear tires) would be roughly the same for both of these tests and would not be directly proportional to the HP difference. I am assuming that the drive train components are designed so that the increased HP is not deforming them out of spec and the drive train is turning the same RPM in both tests.

I suspect the real world situation is that only engine builders know what the internal friction effects of engine mods are. To most people it's not important because there isn't much you can do about it.

So install your mod, dyno it before and after and assume that your drive train is eating about the same power and that the increase in power is the net of some unknown change in internal friction.

Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 02:27 PM
  #15  
NOVAsupra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by i_heart_my_DB8,May 6 2005, 01:19 PM


That's what I said! I think the HP would be lost in generating the same amount of friction, but only faster.
the friction force is the same but as you accelerate the body, you are increasing the work (energy), a fixed portion of this energy is absorbed by the body, the rest is lost in most cases as heat....
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #16  
dhayner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Default

Originally Posted by mr.B,May 6 2005, 09:40 AM
The faster you rub your hands togather the more friction that motion creates. I am just trying to come up with a good analogy
The analogy is not in how fast you hub your hands, but in how hard you press them together.

You run the drivetrain through the same speed range unmodified and modified, but the load on the gears, bearings, etc is increased in proportion to the horsepower increase. The friction and the power loss will also increase in the same proportion. Roughly speaking.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
707S2K
S2000 Forced Induction
7
Aug 29, 2008 08:36 PM
S2K23
S2000 Talk
19
Feb 24, 2008 02:04 PM
FF2Skip
Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners
15
Mar 12, 2007 05:58 AM
batikan
S2000 Talk
3
Apr 10, 2006 11:20 AM
atraenk
Car and Bike Talk
0
Jan 19, 2003 10:17 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM.