S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Expensive Gas - Does the s2000 HAVE to have it?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #31  
Dave-ROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by JohnR_in_la,Nov 7 2005, 09:45 PM
LOL you guys are funny, most of you are ignoring his question, and turning it into a value judgement of whether the car deserves hi-test...

The question was, is it detrimental. And the scientific answer for Variable valve timed engines is a resounding NO, it won't hurt his engine, and it the engine won't "miss" or anything wierd.

And actually, the car runs dang good on 87....
I didn't ignore it. It's possible and fine if you want, however, the ECU will retard the timing like I said. This will result in a loss of performance. Also, the ECU will have to detect knock via the knock sensor before it retards the timing, therefore, the motor is already experiencing preignition for the ECU to take corrective measure.

Not going to be a problem under most cases, but why run any risks with detonation to save a few bucks on a $30,000 car? Even if you fill up once a week and let's say the difference in 3 bucks.. 156 bucks a year.. not exactly a large sum of money.

Now if Honda did what Toyota did with the 88-89 MR2 SC's then there'd be a simple solution for running 87 octane.. just flip a switch on the dash (which retarded the timing).. but Honda likely assumed that most owners would just put 91 or higher octane in it.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #32  
allkingz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

My S2000 has an extra pedal to the left of my brake pedal. Do I HAVE to use it?
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #33  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Dave is correct. It's like tieing your shoes after they've been put on. They have to come undone for you to tie them. You don't just go down and retie them if they don't need it.

Um, yeah something like that
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #34  
530s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Playing devils advocate here... You used to have to change your oil every 3000 miles, now if you buy a BMW, you can go 15000...

In all seriousness, I think it's a little crass to say we're a bunch of rich kids giving the guy a hard time. I think it's fair to say a good percentage of us work pretty damn hard to be able to "splurge" on premium- not to mention afford the car itself.

Look at it this way, it's still about half of what it costs everywhere else. Enjoy $3 a gallon while it lasts.

Edit
If you want to take it EVEN further-- a guys wife called in on last weeks "Car Talk" (National Public Radio show.. Pretty funny, actually) He's a retired engineer. Guess what he does to save gas? Only fill up a quarter tank to save hauling around the weight of the other 3/4 of a tank of gas.... In theory this would work. (Except when you actually factor the stop and go of having to fill up 4 times as often)

To each his own.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #35  
Ronin2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

Dude if you cant afford 2 extra bucks get a different car cheap ass!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #36  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

as people have already stated.

if you put regular in, you have to suffer some detonation before the ECU retards the timing. the ECU is not magical and does not preemptively predict you used 87 octane.

even then, it will continue to "try" and get back to a normal timing mapping, so it will "test" every so often by slightly advancing until it detonates again, and then repeats the cycle.

this will cause the car to lose power, (duh, you're retarding the timing) and also possibly suffer a bit in gas mileage. i've seen burnt pistons from owners who used 87 octane on the car. not a pretty sight.


to answer someone else's question, yes even a stock S2000 on 94 octane will have some timing slightly pulled. it's because our knock sensors/ecu are practically paranoid. however, that doesn't mean that 87 won't cause any detonation before the ECU retards the timing even more.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 09:25 PM
  #37  
SenderGreen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 1
From: Monrovia
Default

to answer someone else's question, yes even a stock S2000 on 94 octane will have some timing slightly pulled. it's because our knock sensors/ecu are practically paranoid. however, that doesn't mean that 87 won't cause any detonation before the ECU retards the timing even more.
Thanks for the info. I just wanted to say that I wasn't saying that 87 or 89 was OK. My original posts are on the first page of this thread. Can anyone elaborate on how a Honda knock sensor detects detonation, or is that tough to say because it's all proprietery stuff. Thanks again, last question, sorry for hijacking.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #38  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Nov 7 2005, 09:58 PM
the ECU is not magical and does not preemptively predict you used 87 octane.
lol
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 04:32 AM
  #39  
Dave-ROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by SenderGreen,Nov 8 2005, 01:25 AM
Thanks for the info. I just wanted to say that I wasn't saying that 87 or 89 was OK. My original posts are on the first page of this thread. Can anyone elaborate on how a Honda knock sensor detects detonation, or is that tough to say because it's all proprietery stuff. Thanks again, last question, sorry for hijacking.
Knock sensors are the same in general. To simplify and provide an example, they are simple piezo devices. They sense the shock caused by pre-ignition and create a signal that is sent to the ECU, the ECU then takes tha signal, processes it and retards the timing. As stated above, the ECU will then eventually increase the timing again until it pings again, then it starts all over.

A real world example is any non-radar alarm system. A lot of alarms use piezo devices for shock sensors, when the alarm brain gets the signal from it it analyzes the sine wave of the signal and determines whether it should give just a alert beep or start it's full wail.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 04:56 AM
  #40  
jherm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Default

My '00 S2K, '02 BMW, and '04 S4 all run fine on 89 octane. I haven't tried 87.
It isn't about what you can afford, it's about what works without paying extra
for no reason. Try it out.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 AM.