S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

gears

Old Nov 3, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #1  
maxsales's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Bonita Springs, FL
Default gears

I know from reading this forum the most popular read end change is 4.56. I am wondering if anyone has gone the other way to say 3.55?

If you calibrate speed in gear using a 3.55 rear end an ap2 would run to about 65 in 2nd and 90 in third. This seems like nice useable speeds. IMO with the standard rear end we just run out of each lower gear to quickly.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #2  
dyhppy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica-SoCal
Default

that would make an exciting car very BORING. good unorthadox thinking
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #3  
villain2000's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,294
Likes: 0
From: The Steel City
Default

Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #4  
s2kshift9k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,367
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

+1
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 01:56 PM
  #5  
Amer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,582
Likes: 4
From: CA
Default

What if you go with 3.xx gears granted you got a 400hp turbo S, now that would be useful
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #6  
Ustemuf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

if i had a 400 hp turbo S i would still use gears.. 4.44's or 4.57's. they make you go faster still longer gears will just accelerate you slower, even if you have the extra power. the argument of "staying in boost longer" basically means you are just going slower unless you want to hit top speeds of 160+... then you should keep the stock gears.

putting 3.55's in your car would ruin it..
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #7  
SpeedxRacer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,029
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Default

Car would go no where with the amount of torque our car makes.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #8  
timg's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 35
From: Decatur, GA
Default

I'd love to have anything in the 3.xx range. If I ever have rear diff trouble, that is exactly what I will do. I'm not worried about it slowing me down. I would rather have the lower cruise RPM and longer first gear.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #9  
kenstyle's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by timg,Nov 3 2006, 04:37 PM
I'd love to have anything in the 3.xx range. If I ever have rear diff trouble, that is exactly what I will do. I'm not worried about it slowing me down. I would rather have the lower cruise RPM and longer first gear.

Tim
Me too.

I think the stock 4.10 is already too aggressive as it is.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
Woodson's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

^^What???
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.