HID comparison?
The price. Bulbs arent the thing to worry about. Its the ballasts. Ive used Mculloch (spelling) in the past and have had great results. People claim they arent very good, but Ive installed about 15 sets on BMWs, Hondas, VWs, and never an issue. They run about mid 200s on ebay with warranty.
OEM japanese car bulbs (all japanese cars with xenons) are made by OSRAM (which is Sylvania.)
Go with Mculloch, and save the money.
OEM japanese car bulbs (all japanese cars with xenons) are made by OSRAM (which is Sylvania.)
Go with Mculloch, and save the money.
Originally Posted by dp32185,Apr 11 2006, 12:12 PM
but if i upgrade to 8000k bulbs...i could just use my stock balllast right? so i could go with whatever bulbs?
please dont tell me youre moving up to 8k becuase "its bluer" thats just gay....you get HID because you want better visiblility, not because you want a blulebeam of light.
Originally Posted by flipboy326,Apr 11 2006, 01:26 PM
why do you want to go up to 8k? youre actually losing usable light......thats why most OEM hid kits run 3500-4500k, becuase its the brightest, and has the mostr useable lght band.......
please dont tell me youre moving up to 8k becuase "its bluer" thats just gay....you get HID because you want better visiblility, not because you want a blulebeam of light.
please dont tell me youre moving up to 8k becuase "its bluer" thats just gay....you get HID because you want better visiblility, not because you want a blulebeam of light.
and yes, i like 8000k better because they look better IMO. let's not run over my preference/opinion because you think otherwise.
my 8000k currently was purchased used and after 1 week...one eye went out on me. the 'cell' looking part of the bulb looks to be burnt. so i was just wondering if this is common with no-brand bulbs.
Originally Posted by flipboy326,Apr 11 2006, 01:26 PM
please dont tell me youre moving up to 8k becuase "its bluer" thats just gay....
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by dp32185,Apr 11 2006, 10:38 AM
i ran 8000k on my S and i liked it better. you don't lose noticeable amounts of visibility either. i'm running one eye 4300k and one eye 8000k currently (the other 8000k blew out on me). brightness is similiar besides the fact that 8000k has a blue hue instead of fluorescent.
and yes, i like 8000k better because they look better IMO. let's not run over my preference/opinion because you think otherwise.
my 8000k currently was purchased used and after 1 week...one eye went out on me. the 'cell' looking part of the bulb looks to be burnt. so i was just wondering if this is common with no-brand bulbs.
and yes, i like 8000k better because they look better IMO. let's not run over my preference/opinion because you think otherwise.
my 8000k currently was purchased used and after 1 week...one eye went out on me. the 'cell' looking part of the bulb looks to be burnt. so i was just wondering if this is common with no-brand bulbs.
The amount of hours on a capsule have a significant result on their Lumens. Lumens being the amount of light produced from the capsule. The older they are, more lumens are lost but you gain more "color". The newer they are the brighter they are but with less "color". It's a trade off. You probalby think the 8K is brighter due to being newer and the having the old 4300k to compare to.
Stick with stock, OEM Phillips part# 85122 rated at 4300K or the Osram/Sylvania rated at around 4300k if you want the "color". Osram tends to be "bluer". Or go with the Phillips Ultinons, but they are pricey.
The difference you ask? 8K is a waste of money, it's not stock, it's aftermarket and will not last as long and will look horrible after about 100 hours or so. Also price, you can get stock NEW capsules on ebay at $50-$60. akinaboy on ebay, i get all my capsules from him.
Rice if you ask me, but that's just my opinion.




