how hard and cost to change steering ratio
A quote from hondanews.com in reference for changes made in '04 (difference between ap1 and ap2)
"Revised Electrically Powered Steering (EPS) programming with optimized steering gearbox ratios and enhanced steering bushing rigidity"
At no point did they mention the steering rack, so I am curious if there is actually much if any difference between the two, or if it is simply a reprogramming of the ecu for the electric power assist that needs to be replaced/reprogrammed.
Which brings up the next question, is this controlled by the main ecu, or does it have it's own dedicated unit? My guess would be it has its own since I haven't heard of anyone who has an aem ems having to program their steering assist, which then leads me to believe that you may just be able to swap the ecu from an ap1 if you want.
"Revised Electrically Powered Steering (EPS) programming with optimized steering gearbox ratios and enhanced steering bushing rigidity"
At no point did they mention the steering rack, so I am curious if there is actually much if any difference between the two, or if it is simply a reprogramming of the ecu for the electric power assist that needs to be replaced/reprogrammed.
Which brings up the next question, is this controlled by the main ecu, or does it have it's own dedicated unit? My guess would be it has its own since I haven't heard of anyone who has an aem ems having to program their steering assist, which then leads me to believe that you may just be able to swap the ecu from an ap1 if you want.
Originally Posted by Sfkn2,Apr 6 2007, 07:05 AM
Can I ask why people do this?
or something like that... i think u only really see a benefit on the track with tight turns
Originally Posted by deathsled,Apr 6 2007, 08:39 AM
yeah I would like to know the OP's justification for wanting to change the steering ratio 

Yes, AP1s have a quicker steering ratio than AP2s - I believe it is 13.1 instead of 14.1, BUT according to Honda, they "slower steering ratio" on the AP2s is compensated for by the fact that the front tires have a wider footprint. So in effect, the net change is supposed to be zero.




