S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.
View Poll Results: If your S could have one of these specs straight out of the factory, which one would u choose?
Factory intercooled, low-compression forged pistons with a small turbo good for ~300 flywheel hp
27.60%
2.5L, high-compression pistons, 8k redline, with ITBs good for also ~300 flywheel hp
32.13%
Lightweight, quick, retractable hardtop convertible similar to the one on the new Mazda Miata
10.41%
A curb weight of ~2300-2400 lbs with a much stiffer suspension good for 1.00G on the skidpad
29.86%
Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

If your S could have one of these specs straight

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
kenstyle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Default If your S could have one of these specs straight

Well?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
kenstyle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Default

Just trying to get a general idea of how many boost junkies, N/A motorheads, looks over performance people, and trackwhores on s2ki.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #3  
Project22a's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

I'd fall under the trackwhore category.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #4  
sjrick777's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Default

I went with lighter and tighter

But I had to think about it for a minute ... 2.5 liter @ 8K redline would be a close second choice.

Retractable hardtop
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #5  
minh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 697
Likes: 6
Default

aftermarket boost is available so theres no need for factory ones

hardtop can also be bought, oem or aftermarket, so a retractable is not necessary

weight reduction can be done if i want a track-only car, suspension can be upgrade with aftermarket parts

but there is no replacement for displacement, so im gonna have to go with the 2.5L
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:29 PM
  #6  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

hmmmm like our cars don't handle well enough already? and even better with some well-selected parts.

I wouldn't mind the turbo option...gotta love the out-of-the-box potential of those turbo cars.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #7  
Vitt's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 6
From: West Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyCB,Sep 7 2006, 09:29 PM
hmmmm like our cars don't handle well enough already?


Give me lighter with the current suspension for street use. I'll take care of stiffer and 1G when I start tracking the car. Or, have a "Track trim" as an option, with the stiffer suspension, sort of like the sports package on the Lotus Elise. Keep the power windows thought
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #8  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

Light weight hands down. That's not as easy to attain as the other stuff.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #9  
d.h's Avatar
d.h
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Well, I think that if the acura RDX does well with the so-called dual chamber turbo, then I won't be surprise of seeing more Honda/Acura car being FI from factory in the near future.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #10  
k0llateral's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

Retractable HT!!!!!! but I would have to go with lighter and tighter. with the Hardtop hehe..
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 AM.