LS1 + S2000 = ?????
hahaha someone needs to take this car to the s2000 homecomming, honda would crap themselves and probably kick them out if they saw this!



I mean its a cool thing and everything but why go to all that trouble for what? to say you have a v8 s2000. that is pretty badass to say but why!! LS1 has 350hp 375tq and it will never handle the same


why....
input everyone! I'm not sure as to be happy about this or sad.
my brother in-law has a 93 RX7 with a LS6 in it but thats because the rotary motor is a piece. The s2k engine is a piece of mechanical art in comparison to that dumb mazda contraption commonly referred to as a wankel rotary.
F20C > 13B IMHO
<--- F20C
^
13B



I mean its a cool thing and everything but why go to all that trouble for what? to say you have a v8 s2000. that is pretty badass to say but why!! LS1 has 350hp 375tq and it will never handle the same



why....
input everyone! I'm not sure as to be happy about this or sad.
my brother in-law has a 93 RX7 with a LS6 in it but thats because the rotary motor is a piece. The s2k engine is a piece of mechanical art in comparison to that dumb mazda contraption commonly referred to as a wankel rotary.
F20C > 13B IMHO
<--- F20C^
13B
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by TurboViper,Sep 4 2007, 09:08 PM
why go to all that trouble for what? to say you have a v8 s2000. that is pretty badass to say but why!! LS1 has 350hp 375tq and it will never handle the same 


why....



why....
- The torque is insane on that motor. There are turbo'd s2000 owners who dont even have that kind of torque.
- The engine will be more reliable with light mods than a f20/f22 with the same power output
- You dont know how much the motor weighs either. The ls1 is barely heavier than a f20/f22. A s2000 with FI will have the same weight (maybe less). So the handling wont be an issue. Get your facts straight.




