S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

May 07 Import Tuner

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #1  
l-teg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default May 07 Import Tuner

Just got the May 07 Import Tuner Mag & in the Power Pages they mod an S2000

Mods

1st - base line with a full tune up done 186.9HP/117.8TQ
2nd - Skunk2 Mega Power Exhaust 198.6HP/125.3TQ
3rd - 5Zigen 4-2-1 Stainless Exhaust Manifold 201.8HP/129.2TQ
4th - AEM (EMS) Engine Management System 207.9HP/129.4TQ

not bad a total of +25HP & +21TQ for some simple mods

The car was also tuned on a Dyno & they did a tune up on the car prior.

The car was a 2003 with 33,000 miles on it.

total cost of mods was MSRP $4180.36

I'm sure you could find it cheaper out there but a good review of how the products work together.

if you have any other reviews like this from mag can you post.

Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #2  
jeggy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 0
Default

for 4K i would rather get a tune, 60mm catback, testpipe, and a night at the strip club
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #3  
B.C.'s Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59,877
Likes: 12
From: Area 51
Default

SC FTW
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
chuhsi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 4
From: San Francisco
Default

Almost 12hp from an exhaust? I'm pressed
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #5  
GPW03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Back-cracker' date='Mar 17 2007, 06:29 PM
SC FTW
Ditto!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
Picturepro's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,143
Likes: 2
From: 949
Default

$4100 I would have gone with a used SC and added ...80-100 whp?
and would have been smog legal

EMS not smogable
exhaust would be over the California 95db or less
Header... prob not smogable
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #7  
replica's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

the stock whp sucks, that over 20% driveline losses


edit: ^ nice FSR, still riding my trusty '99
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 17, 2007 | 07:58 PM
  #8  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

we already covered this. the pulls were done on a dyno dynamics, which read LOWER than mustangs. dude got all those parts comp't, +20whp for free, i'll take it.

side rant:

why dont some guys understand the not all of us want turbo's or VTSC's?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #9  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

that makes for a 270 S2000 @ the flywheel. Not bad not bad at all for an NA 2.0
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #10  
gomarlins3's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 23,390
Likes: 105
From: Kuna Idaho
Default

$4100 for 25 WHP? No thanks. I'll spend $1000 more and get 100 WHP.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 PM.