S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

MotorTrend video on S2000 handling

Thread Tools
 
Old May 7, 2007 | 05:40 PM
  #21  
Hawkstrike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Near Motown
Default

LOL. The video was preceded by a Miata ad.

Cool vid. The article in MT doesn't give the racing driver's full comments, which are much better in context in the video.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #22  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by Hawkstrike,May 7 2007, 08:40 PM
LOL. The video was preceded by a Miata ad.
Yea, and that's all I can see. I've tried three different browsers, and they all three think they've loaded the entire page after the Mazda ad finishes. I guess I could boot to Windoze, but I'd almost rather not see the thing.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 06:14 PM
  #23  
ChuckV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: Westfield, NJ
Default

Nice video! In the week I've had my S2K, I've found it to be one of the most neutral, well balanced cars I've ever owned. It's easy to get the back out if you want it out, but it also slips in a very progressive manner that's easy to control. I haven't done anything really ham-fisted to the car (jumping off the gas going at or above the limit in a corner with a lot of steering angle), but so far, it's responses have been very predictable, and it comunicates them well. The only time I've had any unexpected oversteer is hitting a patch of bad pavement mid-corner, and even then, the car let me know that the back end was going out, and I caught it easily.

The car is also very smooth transitioning from an oversteer state back to a neutral state. It doesn't feel at all upset, and weight doesn't get shifted around in unexpected ways.

Only part of the "package" that has been at all disapointing are the brakes. They aren't bad, they just aren't quite up to the level of the rest of the car. It's the one area where I can see a negative difference between this car and the Boxster. Doesn't really detract from the fun, but definitely makes me think about a BBK at some point.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #24  
haemmeri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Nice find! 3k power band is slightly optimistic though ;-). Also Cayman and Exige videos are nice - actually the review on the S2000 sounds better than cayman... and about the Exige he said it handles just like the race car he usually drives...
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #25  
iKMTi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

yes MY07 FTW! hahaha
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #26  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by haemmeri,May 7 2007, 09:16 PM
3k power band is slightly optimistic though ;-).
I don't even remember if I made the comment in this thread or one of the other ones, but I did recently comment on the 3k powerband of the F20C in first and second gear, and it's not at all optimistic. VTEC engages at 6,000 RPM and pulls to 9,000 if I go right up to the rev limiter (tach and data logger both indicate 9,100 RPM but are a little optimistic). That's 3,000 RPM in the fat part of the power band in first gear. Shifting to second puts the revs at 5,900 RPM (and VTEC doesn't disengage at that speed) so there is a second pull to 9,000. I have 4.30 gears, so (when autocrossing) I never quite reach 9,000 RPM in second, and hardly ever drop out of VTEC in first because 5,900 RPM is something like 22-24 MPH, and I'm only going that slowly around pivot cones. Coming off the pivot cones I still have the engine in VTEC, even though the speeds low, because the back tires are spinning. How is a 3,000 PRM powerband optimistic when it runs from 5,900 RPM to roughly 9,000 RPM, twice, in the only two gears the AP1 uses on an autocross course?

LOL, I probably missed something and you're talking about something totally different ... right.
Sorry if I'm way off base here. Too much activity in too many threads for the last few days.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #27  
ammo1199's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=RED MX5,May 7 2007, 05:10 PM]I just scanned the article quickly, but it looks like a very good description of classical snap oversteer.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #28  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE=ammo1199,May 7 2007, 11:50 PM]No dispute there.

I personally have had no issues in the dry but in the wet I did lose my rear once. Happened when I was taking an exit which then made a u-turn where the end of the U was not visible(higher elevation and a wall), my mistake was going in a trifle too fast and found out that there was a slow moving car in front of me. I abruptly let go of the throttle and found my rear sliding.
I guess traction control kicked in or friction restored the grip but it scared me real bad as it must have been less than 25 mph. Got me wondering what would happen if I were over 55/65 mph.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #29  
Blue_S2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
From: West Los Angeles
Default

Yeah the only time I have experienced the tail wiggle is when the exit near my place gets really wet. I have to make a turn on a slight incline. The tires spin and the back slides a bit if I give it too much gas.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #30  
ammo1199's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,May 7 2007, 09:56 PM
LOL, very good. My favorite probably came from Brock Yates, but I'm not sure ...

"Understeer is when the driver gets scared.
Oversteer is when the passenger gets scared."

Maybe it was Satch Carlson.

Anyway, yea, you're absolutely right. Understeer is a stable condition and is safer than oversteer, which is an unstable condition, so a substantial amount of understeer is designed into most cars. Further, it is not necessarily slower, but it is less certainly fun than oversteer. It tends to scare the driver, and that's no fun at all.

Water, cold, and worn summer tires can all lead to nasty behavoir. I've been scared by unexpected water hazards myself. Even when it's dry the S2000 deserves respect, but it's even more true when the environment is less than ideal. It's a hell of a lot better to drive slower than you really need to be driving than to end up in a crash.

LOL, your tree joke reminded me of a true story, but I think I've posted it before, and it's off topic. Oh well, I haven't seen the video yet, just the Mazda ad, so I'm probably off topic anyway.

I was trying to teach my girlfriend how to drive, using my beloved Fiat 850 Spider. We'd covered several blocks, made some stops and starts, and she was doing wonderfully. As we approached a T intersection I told her to signal a left turn, and then to turn left after stopping at the stop sign and looking for oncoming traffic. The street we were turning on to was one lane wide in each direction, but the two lanes were seperated by curbs and an island, and there were huge oak trees planted in the island running down the middle of the street. As she stopped, I pointed out that she was turning on to a divided street and that she should turn into the lane on the right side of the island. As she turned onto the street she turned a little too much, so she ended up heading for the island, and a HUGE oak tree, but new drivers make that kind of mistake all the time, so I just sat there for a bit waiting for her to correct her mistake. To my surprise, rather than steering over to the right a little more so she'd hit the street rather than the curb and tree, she just kept heading for the tree. I waited as long as I could stand it, to give her a chance to see her mistake and correct it herself, but it just wasn't happening; So I said, calmly, "Watch out for that tree." From where I was sitting it looked like she hadn't heard me, because she did nothing to correct her problem and avoid the tree. I spoke a little louder, "Watch out for that tree." Still nothing, and the tree was coming up pretty quick. I panicked. "WATCH THE TREE! WATCH THE TREE!" Still nothing. I kept saying it louder and louder as the tree got closer and closer, until the last second. Of course I grabbed the wheel soon enough to steer the car around the curb and tree myself, but I was freaking out, because she'd just about crashed my car, and it appeared that she was totally ignoring what I was telling her to do. OK, I'll admit it. I was thoroughly pissed because she had ignored my instructions and scared the crap out of me. I made her stop the car and I took the wheel, and before I pulled off I yelled at her. "Are you DEAF, or WHAT!" Now at this point the poor girl was crying, and she just looked at me with a blank stare. This only upset me more, so I yelled, "Didn't you hear me telling you to watch that damn tree?"

Without missing a beat she responded

"Yea, I heard you.

You told me to watch the tree, and I did.


The closer it got, the more I watched it."


I couldn't help laughing even though I felt stupid for not having given her better instructons. My bad.


Teaching someone how to drive definitely requires some major cojones.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 AM.