NSX vs. our S2K
Originally Posted by Auto|MaG-,Mar 14 2005, 06:32 PM
Ive always wondered how a 91'-96' NSX feels compared to a '04+ S2K. Anyone driven the 2 and care to comment?
Pertinent info:
Bone Stock S2k w/ S0-2 Tires
Mods to the NSX: Intake, Exhaust, Bilstien Sport Shocks, Comptech Springs, Comptech Sway Bars, Dali Strut Tower Bar, Slotted Rotors, carbon brake pads, 215/45/16 245/40/17 Falken Azenis Sport Tires.
Overall Impressions:
The S2K feels like it can turn faster without the "bite" of snap oversteer. Perhaps it is how I drive. However even with the mods to the X, the S2k just feels like it wants to turn in faster. Eg. I have to pay more attention to the S2k on the highway as it like to follow the road surface whereas the X just cruises with slightly less on-center feel. The S just feels grabby. I have used OEM NSX tires and can say I am giving up 5-7% of its feel for the Falkens however the S really feels like it wants to eat up corners.
Power. No real comparison. The S2k is a hoot to drive fast, but in the end it is just not as quick as the X, in real terms as well as the a$$-o-meter feel.
Braking. The carbon pads on the X take a few really good stops to get the heat up to a point where they start to really grab. However in day to day driving I like the S2k brakes better. They are very firm with great feel. The X brakes by comparison are a little less sensitive (most likely due to the compound I am running) but the are not near as firm. I use stock brake lines with ATE-Blue Dot4 fluid.
Ease of use: The X really has the edge here. The car has more torque, and it just makes it that much easier to find a hole in traffic and jump. The S2k requires more drama. That can be a great thing, but if you have a passenger in the car, and that person is not a car nut, going from 6th to 3rd or 4th to make a fast pass is a bit over the top IMHO.
Fun: Subjective, I know.... but I have to say the S2k is more fun to drive. Here is my reasoning. There are more of them out there, and I don't really like having people look at me, or the car, when I drive. It makes me feel self conscious.
The S just attracts less attention and top down motoring is a blast. If you asked me which car I would rather take on a back roads blast, not choice but to say the X. However I don't drive back roads every day, or even once a week. I won't comment on interior, looks, fit and finish, track-ability (I have only tracked the X not the S so I cannot give a good review) as these cars were targeted for two different markets and two different decades.
Hope this helps. Feel free to disagree, would love to hear more comments and impressions.
Originally Posted by SilverKnight,Mar 14 2005, 07:41 PM
S2ks should match the early NSX in straightline speed. I believe they were low 14s back in the early 90s.
Pics:
My 01 S2000
My 95 NSX
I have an MY04 S2000 and I've driven my friend 92 NSX and there are a couple differences I felt that people left out.
1. The gearbox on the S2000 is one of the best on the market today but the NSX gearbox is great in its own right. Let me explain. The engagement of the gear is not as smooth but sort of clicked in. Yet I don
1. The gearbox on the S2000 is one of the best on the market today but the NSX gearbox is great in its own right. Let me explain. The engagement of the gear is not as smooth but sort of clicked in. Yet I don


