S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Is it really worth modding an S2000?

Old Aug 6, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #11  
FatfreeS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Default

With my old AP1 I always felt like I wanted more power, now that I have an AP2 with an intake and exhaust I'm so content with the car. Only minor issue I could see changing would be getting a reflash to open up the midrange a little bit to help even out the crossover.

I used to wring my old one out all the time, now if I go over 4-5k its pretty rare. Maybe its me getting older but having been away for a few years from an S and now getting back in one I appreciate it so much more. Honda really did an outstanding job with this car IMO.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #12  
Seattle2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by Tanuki,Aug 6 2010, 06:53 PM
So,
After one year of ownership, hundreds of Dollars and countless hours of research my car is way louder, 50lbs lighter and "possibley a tiny bit" faster.
Great....
The reason I'm saying this is that it seems almost pointless to go on, lm not sure I even like my car more now than when I got it.
In comparison, my previous car, an Audi TT 225 responded to mods like you would not believe. A simple re-flash got me 25hp and 30 ftlbs instantly, my 5zigen 17" wheels reduced unsprung weight by 44lbs. Total weight reduction was an easy 300lbs total. Coilovers and corner balancing transformed the handling in one weekend. A vag-com allowed me to fine tune/monitor pretty much every sytem outside of the engine. At the end of the day, every mod made a huge difference. It was quiet, luxurious, could almost keep up with an S2000 and it only cost $13K
Love the S but damn, its tough to effectively mod!!
wahhh wahhh wahhh
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 10:49 PM
  #13  
alSpeed2k's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,599
Likes: 79
From: The 604
Default

Originally Posted by Too Soon Jr,Aug 6 2010, 06:05 PM
I think you're looking at it the wrong way. Consider this: you put all that money into the TT and it STILL can't beat a stock S2000.

If you want speed, stop spending your money on bolt-ons and save up for FI.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
alSpeed2k's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,599
Likes: 79
From: The 604
Default

Originally Posted by FatfreeS2k,Aug 6 2010, 09:38 PM
With my old AP1 I always felt like I wanted more power, now that I have an AP2 with an intake and exhaust I'm so content with the car. Only minor issue I could see changing would be getting a reflash to open up the midrange a little bit to help even out the crossover.

I used to wring my old one out all the time, now if I go over 4-5k its pretty rare. Maybe its me getting older but having been away for a few years from an S and now getting back in one I appreciate it so much more. Honda really did an outstanding job with this car IMO.
^the car is definitely more fun to drive after a reflash! Too bad the op has an AP1, otherwise bolt ons and Flashpro would make the car livelier.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 12:43 AM
  #15  
cantsleep's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: All over the Socal
Default

Originally Posted by Tanuki,Aug 6 2010, 05:53 PM
So,
After one year of ownership, hundreds of Dollars and countless hours of research my car is way louder, 50lbs lighter and "possibley a tiny bit" faster.
Great....
The reason I'm saying this is that it seems almost pointless to go on, lm not sure I even like my car more now than when I got it.
In comparison, my previous car, an Audi TT 225 responded to mods like you would not believe. A simple re-flash got me 25hp and 30 ftlbs instantly, my 5zigen 17" wheels reduced unsprung weight by 44lbs. Total weight reduction was an easy 300lbs total. Coilovers and corner balancing transformed the handling in one weekend. A vag-com allowed me to fine tune/monitor pretty much every sytem outside of the engine. At the end of the day, every mod made a huge difference. It was quiet, luxurious, could almost keep up with an S2000 and it only cost $13K
Love the S but damn, its tough to effectively mod!!
with that mind, i think you are better of selling your S and buy something that is more tuneable

i went to the Audi dealership a few months ago helping my friend getting a A6
the sales guy offered me to trade my CR in for the TT.... i was like Never gonna happen as long as im alive that 2.0 liter turbo or 3.2 engines in TT are widely used for their other lines of audi cars and some in VW,,,,,, not unique enough for me

you just gotta love your S the way it is built... if you are not satisfied with it then sell it and get something else
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 04:13 AM
  #16  
SlowTeg's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by FatfreeS2k,Aug 6 2010, 09:38 PM
Only minor issue I could see changing would be getting a reflash to open up the midrange a little bit to help even out the crossover.
That and a test pipe are about the only real mods I've really thought about doing. They even help if you go FI. Regardless though, it seems like you don't get a whole lot of "bang for your buck" with a modded NA s2k. Anyone buying an exhaust and bolt ons and expecting good power gains is simply being unrealistic.

After "growing up" a little, and having a heavily modded honda before, I understand the "slippery slope" of modding your car. These cars are certainly great stock, and you really have to think twice about the cost/benefit of each mod.

As others said, if you want real power gains, either go FI or don't bother imo (for substantial power gains). These cars are really built for a road course, not straight line speed.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 06:15 AM
  #17  
Tanuki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the input!
Seems like most people are saying that apart from FI the S2000 is about as quick as it can be right off the lot.
I do love the car as it is but miss the satisfaction/fun of modding. Maybe I'll invest in some track days instead!
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 06:22 AM
  #18  
s2k aok's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,616
Likes: 2
From: Lompoc CA
Default

a used supercharger kit is the best bet, it's about the same cost as a new jdm intake/header/exhaust setup that only gains 15 whp over stock...
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #19  
UmarS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,678
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tanuki,Aug 6 2010, 05:53 PM
It was quiet, luxurious, could almost keep up with an S2000 and it only cost $13K
You see, bro, almost is the key word here. Even after $13k in aftermarket junk, it could almost keep up with an S2000. "Almost" doesn't cut it, man.
Instead of spending hundreds of dollars on bolt-ons, maybe even thousands depending on if you wanted to participate in the whole Mugen scene, you could just save up for a supercharger or turbo. Just a thought, friend.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #20  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

The only way to make an S seriously faster is to go FI - everything else is for personal taste or annoying other people (cough Invidia cough). You don't get a lot of power from simple mods because Honda actually did all the tuning work for you ahead of time.

Imo, instead of spending $13k in mods, just buy a better car.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM.