Rear Difussers
I saw this posting on EBay and was curious if anyone has installed one, or has any experience as towards whether they're effective or just bling:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAP...33646#LARGEVIEW
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAP...33646#LARGEVIEW
Originally Posted by TrackStar,Oct 19 2004, 08:07 AM
If you really want one check out bulletproof.com or rmstuning.com.
Rear diffusers are coming out on Ferrari's and Alfa's, but I wonder what effect if any these aftermarket ones have? I'd think the fins would have to be pretty close to the ground to be effective.
I don't know much about them, but my understanding is that they dissipate the hot air under the car, hence reducing lift(improving downforce). For the most part front spoilers, rear spoilers, and diffusers all work optimally at higher speeds... So I assume it would be functional at 100 plus mph, and otherwise for bling. Of course this is all speculation, I don't really know anything.
They do help areodynamics. Look at the bottom of your car- now imagine if the top was like that? The car would have a terrible cod. Smooting out the bottom will give you a higher top speed and faster high end acceleration.
That thing shown in the picture is not likely to have any benefit. There is a lot more to good aerodynamic design than just making something that kind of looks like something else.
-Mike (aeronautical engineer)
-Mike (aeronautical engineer)
I wouldn't think the item pictured would do anything, but you do see rear difussers on DTM type cars, so, on the extreme they do work. I'd much rather have the car pulled to the ground from the bottom than pushed down from the top.
I am going with the all bling opinion until someone can show different.
I wish someone who has one would care to join in...
Here's an explanation: http://www.insideracingtechnology.co...0underwing.htm
I am going with the all bling opinion until someone can show different.
I wish someone who has one would care to join in...
Here's an explanation: http://www.insideracingtechnology.co...0underwing.htm
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by mosesbotbol,Oct 19 2004, 11:53 AM
I'd much rather have the car pulled to the ground from the bottom than pushed down from the top.
A nice smooth underside that is low in the front and comes up in the back will produce some good downforce (and a lot of drag). But just tacking this thing on to the back where the airflow is already dirty will probably do nothing good, and may in fact make the car more unstable at speed. Only way to know for sure, though, is to test it (either in the real world or in CFD). My money says these manufacturers don't know CFD from BFDs.
Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Oct 19 2004, 12:09 PM
That thing shown in the picture is not likely to have any benefit. There is a lot more to good aerodynamic design than just making something that kind of looks like something else.
-Mike (aeronautical engineer)
-Mike (aeronautical engineer)
And downforce created by a venturi (diffuser) has much less drag than downforce created by flow deflection (wing or spoiler). This is why cars such as the Modena, the Enzo and the McLaren F1 utilize diffusers instead of large drag producing wings.
Don't be fooled by the thought that you have to spend big money to get the great performance that the more high priced companies sell. Burt Rutan proved that just a couple of weeks ago.
-Ben (Civil Engineer specializing in Hydraulics)



