S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 At a Glance chart by ROAD & TRACK

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
S2000 Driver's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield County
Default

Below is the famous ROAD & TRACK At a Glance chart for the S2000.

Note the acceleration times: 0 -- 60 mph, 6.2 seconds; 0 -- 100 mph, 15.6 seconds; and 1/4 mile, 14.8 seconds @ 97.5 mph. Seems the R&T staff hadn't yet mastered the nuances of revving to 9,000 rpm!

ROAD & TRACK revised the acceleration times in subsequent issues of the magazine to: 0 -- 60 mph, 5.5 seconds; 0 -- 100 mph, 14.2 seconds; and 1/4 mile, 14.1 seconds @ 99.6 mph.

Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 05:00 AM
  #2  
KeithD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 0
From: WASTED in Margaritaville
Default

Road and Track does not drop the clutch when they test. You can read it in the notes on their test table in the back. Now C&D and Motor Trend do WHATEVER it takes to get the best time.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 05:35 AM
  #3  
rai's Avatar
rai
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 10
From: mount airy
Default

This was an early test and the car may not have been broken in. I think C&D also got 6.2 sec on their first test but the car only had like 350 miles on the odo.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 06:17 AM
  #4  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Interesting drawing of the car... with the spare in the tool well (or is it actually there in JDM cars?)
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 08:10 AM
  #5  
Destiny2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 2
From: Transporter
Default

Originally posted by WestSideBilly
Interesting drawing of the car... with the spare in the tool well (or is it actually there in JDM cars?)
That's funny, never noticed that!

Humidity at 10%, is that for real? In Japan?

Keep 'em coming s2000 driver, can't get enough!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 09:27 AM
  #6  
honda606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 7
From: houston
Default

Ok everyone. This is mainly for KeithD to dispell his belief in Motor Trend. I kind of like C&D but all the magazines can be lame at any given moment. This is a thread I am sure many of you will find interesting. It is an argument/debate that took place between one of the members at LS1.com and an editor at Motor Trend. I had no idea MT takes it easy on cars like the editor claims. Tell me what you think about it.


http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t...ght=Motor+Trend
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 11:29 AM
  #7  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

The editor is full of it. MT rags on cars as much if not more than anyone. They consistently report some of the best 0-60, 0-100, and 1/4 times.

Of course, most of the folks posting in that thread are idiots and/or a-holes. Very lacking of knowledge about testing procedures and what not.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 11:54 AM
  #8  
sandman's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

also, unless i got shafted with my s2000, i believe the HP is 240 @ 8300 and not 250 right?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 12:17 PM
  #9  
S2000 Driver's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield County
Default

Originally posted by sandman
also, unless i got shafted with my s2000, i believe the HP is 240 @ 8300 and not 250 right?
R&T tested a JDM model which has an engine with a higher compression ratio (11.7:1 vs. 11.1:1) and more horsepower (250 vs. 240) than the US model.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
Porsche951's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater
Default

Road &Track did a comparison a short time later. The S2000 was pared up against an "M" Roadster and a Porsche Boxster. The Honda won the comparison test and its 0-60 time was 5.3 seconds it ran the 1/4 in 14.0 This was in September 1999.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 PM.