S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000: Immature handling?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 09:10 PM
  #1  
jzr's Avatar
jzr
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default S2000: Immature handling?

From the new Road & Track, p 54. Quote by John Yukawa, project leader for the 350Z: "I wanted the handling feel to be more mature than that of, say, a Honda S2000."

Ha! Somebody give that guy a ride in a Corvair! The new Z looks okay (like a flattened and angular Audi TT) but appears a bit compromised in many of the same ways the latest Eclipse has been. Good for sales, bad for the enthusiasts. Their stated performance target was the Boxster S, but unless they make it a convertible that comparison can't even be made.

One person or another in my family has owned every iteration of the Z (and my mom still drives her '68 Datsun 510) but I think this one is going to get passed up. The S2000, immature handling and all, is just waaaaay too much fun.

Jason
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 09:16 PM
  #2  
s2kskibum's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Fraser
Default

just sold a 64 corvair convertible. could turn the wheel half way 'round, then start to steer. That's immature handling!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 03:34 AM
  #3  
Takashi KazuMori's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,993
Likes: 0
From: Unknown
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by jzr
[B]From the new Road & Track, p 54.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 04:43 AM
  #4  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

...immature handling? I don't think so!

I'm thinking more like immature driving skills if John Yukawa has actually driven an S2000. As we all know the S2000 rewards the skilled driver and bites the less than skilled driver.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 04:57 AM
  #5  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

Geez guys, take a breath. That's just marketing speak for "softer ride". No need for apoplexy.

You should be proud that your car is one of the target cars for what might just be a new icon.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 05:46 AM
  #6  
JRM's Avatar
JRM
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
From: The BadLands
Default

Thanks Jim, I know I am.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 05:58 AM
  #7  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Do you really think immature handeling = softer ride?
Interesting proposition
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 7, 2001 | 06:01 AM
  #8  
CRitchie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury
Default

Yep... a good sign that you are on top is when everybody is trying to take you down.

Someone once said... "I don't need to advertise, my competition is doing it for me."
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 06:25 AM
  #9  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Triple-H
[B]Do you really think immature handeling = softer ride?
Interesting proposition
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 06:48 AM
  #10  
CRitchie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury
Default

Originally posted by jschmidt
No. They are saying that their car will have a softer ride (probably at the expense of ultimate grip.) Sorry for the imprecision and confusion.
Now that makes sense. When looking at it this way, "immature handling" is a good thing for the enthusaist. It puts more control back into the driver's hands. "Mature handling" puts more responsibility back onto the car making it a safer ride and easier to handle for the every day driver.

You have to admit the S2000 with it's "immature handling" has bitten quite a few drivers on this board.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:47 PM.