S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

To S2000 or not to S2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 06:30 PM
  #11  
frayed's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jerome81:
[B]Porsche Boxster S.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 06:39 PM
  #12  
mister_two's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: Jersey City
Default

Jerome,

I am 6'2" about 175 lbs and I fit in the S2000 like a glove. And that's also why I didn't get the Miata. For a long time, Miata was my first choice. But the tight fit made it impossible for me to get comfortable in the Miata, especially the newer Miatas. It was so disappointing because I absolutely love the looks of the Miata, even more so than the S2000. Of course, the 240hp in the S2000 didn't hurt in convincing me to get the S.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 06:46 PM
  #13  
mister_two's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: Jersey City
Default

Exactly, Coraldoc is absolutely right, ignore the spec sheets (I don't even know what the numbers say), but S2000 has SIGNIFICANTLY more head and leg room than the Miata. I am SO comfortable in the S2000, not so in the Miata.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 06:59 PM
  #14  
StudentDriver's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Union
Default

I was debating this for a couple months too, S2K vs. Boxster S. and then one day one of my friends told me if you really like cars you wouldn't care what badge is on the hood. so I decide to get the S2000 cause they kinda have the same performances figures and the S2K is 20k less. Also the aftermarket parts are much cheaper than the Porsche.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2000 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
2kturkey's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne!
Default

Guys, a big part of the negative about the Borsch Poxster (is that a toxic and contagious Russian soup?! ) is the sheer yuppie image associated with it. I do not think it is an attractive vehicle - it looks like a 1960s Kharmann Ghia on steroids (P.S. I also despise the looks of the Audi TT - my colleague at work cannot live it down everytime I ask him how his VW Beetle is doing).

IMHO a vehicle should be long, low and sleek - I think the Miata achieves this better than the Stook but both are way out in front of the German (I cring to use the word) "competition".

Both of the Japanese vehicles look like they were designed 40 years after the Germans - they are genuine modern vehicles instead of trying to be retro.

I think this typified by the number of vehicles used purely as boulevard cruisers. I guarantee there is a much higher percentage of Stook owners who use their vehicles on the track compared with the others discussed above.





Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grillo
Car and Bike Talk
34
Apr 30, 2012 04:28 AM
s2kwhitepanama
S2000 Talk
26
Jun 13, 2010 11:08 AM
circuitdepot
S2000 Talk
19
Apr 23, 2002 11:13 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 PM.