S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

s2k compared to a civic

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:07 AM
  #1  
supaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: ptown
Default s2k compared to a civic

Some guy was telling me a 2003 or older s2k is basically a civic until 6500rpms
What do you guys think about this comparison?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:14 AM
  #2  
ajkewler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Westminster
Default

I think they're referrring to when the car hits vtec, where hp is is a lot more. Due to the weight of the car, in comparison it might feel like you're driving a civic if you where to shift around 3-4 k rpms. I've notice it being quicker then a civic should I shift above 4k rpms. Its all according to how the driver drives their car I believe, if you're a conservative driver then the accleration might feel like a civic.

As for handling however thats a different story, I've only had a few experiences driving a manual civic, but the handling is no where near as good as the s2k. Well this is just my opinion so no flamin please. Civics are great cars, but to me they just seem more of a econ car rather then a sports car. With the exception of the SI and the type R of course.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #3  
lig's Avatar
lig
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,329
Likes: 199
From: seattle
Default

Does the Civic suddenly become rwd and a convertible @ 6500rpms?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:17 AM
  #4  
supaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: ptown
Default

i think he meant engine wise
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #5  
koala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Default

I owned an '00 Civic and it is NOTHING like an S2000. Even if you're only shifting at 3-4k rpm the S2000 is substantially quicker. Maybe not compared to a 160 HP Civic Si, but to your run-of-the-mill Civic there is certainly a huge difference.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #6  
LemonHead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett
Default

"What do you guys think about this comparison?"

I think this person has spent very little (if any) time behind the wheel of an S2K.

There is no comparison... not even with the Civic Si.

Yes, the pre-VTEC range gives a more docile feel but it's still much more peppy than any stock Civic.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:43 AM
  #7  
USDM_S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Aiea
Default

i own a 94 civic hatch and there is no comparison between the two. only thing good about the civic is the gas mileage...
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:43 AM
  #8  
350's Avatar
350
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: ga
Default

lol i thought it was a miata ..front to back.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:47 AM
  #9  
glagola1's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

Well it depends. I've owned a B16 swapped civic for a while and my girlfriend has a 2003 Si. The S is way peppier than the B16 at any rpm. No comparison there. When compared to the 2003 Si, the S is definately not as torquey. I swear that thing is like an electric car.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #10  
SLiCKYV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

I owned a 97 EX Civic w/Vtec and it's nothing comapred to my s2k. I haven't even vtec'd my S yet. The Civic wasn't a slug but it's unfair to even mention them together in the same sentence.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:31 PM.