S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

s2k vs. mr2

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #1  
dsaulat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
Default s2k vs. mr2

sup guys

i was just curious which car would u say is faster? 0-60 and 1/4 mile

ap2 with hks exhaust and aem cai or
91 stock mr2 with ct20 turbo?
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #2  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

I had a 91 MR2 way back in like 93 I dont remember it being fast. But it was not turbo FWIW
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #3  
Stealth_SUX_'s Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Default

raced a stock mr2 that was stock turbo, it lost big time... i dont know about what would happen if moddified..
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #4  
Stealth_SUX_'s Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Default

I looked it up for u. stock turbo mr2 = 14.7 quarter mile time
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #5  
dsaulat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
Default

cool.. so is the stock turbo ct20 or ct26?
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #6  
Stealth_SUX_'s Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Default

edit... the 90-94 cam wit ct-26 and the 94+ is ct-20
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:28 PM
  #7  
Stealth_SUX_'s Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 1
From: Modesto, CA
Default

US spec mr2 =

0-30 = 1.9secs; 0-40 = 3.1; 0-60 = 6.4; 0-70 = 8.4; 0-80 = 10.8; 0-90 = 14.5; 0-100 = 18.1

As a side note.. all US spec mr2 have a base hp of 200 at teh crank.. no matter what year..
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #8  
dsaulat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
Default

sweet.. thanks dude
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #9  
xtremsiege2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Default

I'm pretty sure the s2000 is faster stock for stock by a decent amount. There are a fair share of jdm swapped mr2's which are 225hp from just a larger turbo i think. That would be a good run, fortunately for them with a factory turbo motor they have the advantage after about 500 bucks..
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #10  
J0eys2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Default

I ran my buddys 93 mr2 when he bought it and i raped him, we were stock at the time. He added bolt ons and so far we're pretty even till 100mph+ But yea stock for stock s2k all day
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jakechowaa
S2000 Street Encounters
20
Dec 24, 2008 04:05 PM
wws2000
S2000 Street Encounters
45
May 3, 2005 12:31 PM
cb1118
Car and Bike Talk
4
Jan 5, 2005 08:07 AM
DrewS2k
S2000 Street Encounters
7
Apr 14, 2003 08:29 AM
sonne
S2000 Street Encounters
6
May 9, 2002 04:01 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 AM.