S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.
View Poll Results: Which s2k would you buy?
2004 NFR w/42k and mods for $18K
16.67%
2008 Chicane w/15k miles for $ 22K
83.33%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Which s2k would you buy?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 05:25 PM
  #1  
pdj's Avatar
pdj
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Default Which s2k would you buy?

Hey guys,

I'm finally in a position where I am actively looking for a s2000 which has been my dream car for 10 years. I've been kicking myself for not buying an s2000 before they got discontinued/during the financial crises. As much as I love s2000's, my blood boils when I see 14 year old ap1's for $20k+ asking prices!

I'm currently considering these two s2000s very seriously, just wanted to see what the s2ki community would choose between the these two s2k's:


2004 NFR asking $18,000:
  • 46,000 miles
  • coilovers/intake/exhaust
  • RPF1's
  • NFR OEM Hardtop
  • Looks really clean (no accidents, etc)
  • comes with all stock parts
  • To be honest NFR isn't my favorite color

2008 Chicane Silver/black interior asking $22,000:
  • 15,000 miles
  • 2 owners/clean autocheck
  • looks new

Personally I'm leaning towards the NFR because its substantially cheaper and it has all of the mods that I eventually would buy. But the chicane silver is SO CLEAN! I plan on keeping whichever S I buy forever, so buying a newer and cleaner s2k could be smart long-term.

What would you do? Please vote and leave your comments below! Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 05:38 PM
  #2  
Nic01101011's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

the newer one with less miles that is stock and only a little more expensive.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 05:58 PM
  #3  
EricJT7's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 2
From: Mukilteo, WA
Default

First off, both sound like excellent deals (though I'd prefer pictures!) *And this is assuming they are both in very good to excellent condition, based on their mileage.* I am skeptical about the NFR though, especially as I don't have much to go on.

I'd take the 2004 NFR for $18,000 with the OEM hardtop-- $3,000 value alone w/ OEM hardware. Assuming it is actually in very good condition, and has tasteful coilovers, exhaust, no stupid Ebay body kit, etc. etc. If you can send me a link to the NFR, I'd be very interested

$22,000 for the 2008 would be the safer vote though, because it is presumably in excellent condition and is presumably 100% stock--or close enough.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
Dravens08S2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 797
Likes: 8
Default

08. Flashpro ftw
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
Gotpepsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 1
From: Las Cruces
Default

You want the virgin or the naughty red head?

That NFR with a hardtop... Oh man, would I love to have a hard top.... But considering that the NFR is not stock, but comes with all original parts I wouldn't pass this one up since the modifications are reversible.

However, I'd go with the 2008; it has 15k miles on it. I'd rather have red than silver, but the 15k miles is hard to beat. Its newer, lower mileage. The 2004, meh. Just walk away before you get tempted to ride the naughty red head. The 2008 is pure, she'll make a great wife.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 06:06 PM
  #6  
5thgen's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 460
Likes: 90
Default

I haven't driven a "drive-by-wire" s2000, but I can't stand how DBW feels in other hondas when driving semi-aggressive.

I like my mechanical cables (00-05), and would rather have the 2004 NFR.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 08:22 PM
  #7  
Soof's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 679
Likes: 38
From: Spring Lake Hts, NJ
Default

Quote: " I plan on keeping whichever S I buy forever, so buying a newer and cleaner s2k could be smart long-term."

I think you answered your own question pdj. I would add that the addition of some features on the '08 that weren't available on the '04 would be a determining factor. Such as the VSA. To me it's a valuable asset.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 15, 2014 | 09:03 PM
  #8  
muamer's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Price is low on the '08......

See if there is anything further you can find out.

Either car would be an excellent option.

Try to provide details regarding the add ons to the NFR.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 09:08 PM
  #9  
crxdx's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

If the 2008 is clean I would go with that. By any chance are you in wny?

Brent
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 05:14 AM
  #10  
08S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Default

I would pay 4k more for newer, less driven and stock S2K.

I am not saying this because I have 08 but I must say that is a good deal. I got mine back in 2011 for more than 22k with 36k miles.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 AM.