S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Snap oversteer

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #51  
jela's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

SPOON SPORTS S2000
the S could be dangerous if you don't know your car
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #52  
GiffS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: Inverloch, Victoria
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Jan 18 2010, 08:38 AM
The AP2 fixed the rear bumpsteer issue, while still maintaining enough rear roll stiffness bias to be fairly neutral at the limit, but even that is too much for many drivers who've been brought up driving cars designed to resolutely understeer at the limit.
So can we retrofit the AP2 rear end?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #53  
dammitjim's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 18
From: WI
Default

Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 11:26 PM
  #54  
clag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Sukeetoshyoo88,Jan 18 2010, 05:29 PM
So, win the bump toe change in the rear. Is there a way to change that? So that there is no toe change in the rear with bump?

I'M guessing that simply changing to coil overs is not gonna do the trick right?
With a dedicated AP1 track car I imagine you could dial in a healthy measure of toe-in, then even with decompression of the rear under braking/throttle-lift you would not be faced with a truckload of toe-out. This would cause a lot of straight-line scrub, impacting acceleration, as well as eating away at the rear tires on a daily driver which makes it a bit impractical for those who track rarely.

Also, if part swapping is in your budget, as CKit suggested:
As a general note: with stiffer springs and more rear rebound damping, forward weight transfer under lift can be drastically reduced.
Neither will prevent the toe change, perhaps make it less dramatic. Just thoughts.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 03:53 AM
  #55  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Sukeetoshyoo88,Jan 18 2010, 05:29 PM
So, win the bump toe change in the rear. Is there a way to change that? So that there is no toe change in the rear with bump?

I'M guessing that simply changing to coil overs is not gonna do the trick right?
Going to stiffer springs/dampers will reduce the toe change inasmuch as it reduces suspension travel. I dunno exactly what the rear toe curve is, but if you increased spring and damping rates by 50%, the range of toe change under a given set of driving conditions should be reduced by about 1/3.

Even with the stock suspension, once you get used to the sort of nonlinear handling of the car (initial oversteer followed by neutrality), it's not so bad, really.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 03:55 AM
  #56  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by gifftech,Jan 18 2010, 06:08 PM
So can we retrofit the AP2 rear end?
I think the difference is in the location of the rear toe arm inner pivot. I.e., you'd have to swap in an AP2 rear subframe. Or you could try to relocate the pivot in the AP1's chassis. Honestly, I think seat time at the limit (autox or HPDE) is much better investment.

There are "bump-steer" kits for the AP1 that replace the toe arms, but some of these have suffered failures in use. I'm a big fan of keeping primary structural components OEM...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 04:15 AM
  #57  
bronxbomber252's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by hecash,Jan 19 2010, 04:29 AM
My AP1 was pretty much a "track car." This is the Toe alignment setting that I settled on after about 2 years of testing.

Front
Toe -0.03 in /-0.04 in
Total Toe -0.07 in

Rear
Toe 0.09 in /0.10 in
Total Toe 0.19 in

It will take several hundred miles on the street or highway to screw up your tires but they will be screwed up.
I run a lot of toe in (1/4in) due to doing a lot of autox on my 01... It is also my daily driver and Although I will say I probably have quicker tire wear my tires never got screwed up in any way. with 1/4in toe in and -2.5deg camber in the rear, no toe in the front and -1.6deg camber front I have perfectly even tire wear after 1 or 2 autox's a month and 1000-1500 (sometimes more) street miles a month.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 04:24 AM
  #58  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

[QUOTE=clag,Jan 19 2010, 12:26 AM]With a dedicated AP1 track car I imagine you could dial in a healthy measure of toe-in, then even with decompression of the rear under braking/throttle-lift you would not be faced with a truckload of toe-out.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #59  
clag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
Default

[QUOTE=ZDan,Jan 19 2010, 05:24 AM]IMO the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #60  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

[QUOTE=ZDan,Jan 19 2010, 05:24 AM] Forward weight transfer under lift is going to be exactly the same under a given rate of deceleration, regardless of what spring and damping rates are.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 PM.